• MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    As our evolution slows

    Well that’s bullshit.

    But yes, adapting to new things is usually a generational thing. And tech. progress accelerated past that about two generations ago. This already creates issues with parents and teachers not being able to teach the children proper media competence (because basic IT knowledge never penetrated to them either). Which leads to the misinformation crysis.

      • Nycto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t know that it would matter much as long as there is sexual selection rather than natural selection. For instance, if a random cross section of a population dies, then there’s no evolution because there’s no reason that the survivors lived to pass on genetics. Is that not correct?

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Humans still select for more gracility on average. And social selection is part of evolution too (and not only humans do it).

        • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          the state of being gracefully slender.

          Im Learning a new word today but I still dont understand after looking up. Could you clarify context?

          • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Well, human skeletal gracility compared to other hominides. There was a study years ago, that human still sexually selects for even more gracility (on average), while already getting to the point, where the bones get too thin to properly support their other roles in metabolism.

            Ah, and about the “evolution slowing” part being bullshit; maybe 10 years ago already? Other studies that disproved the myth.

  • neutronbumblebee@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is exactly why colonizing Mars would be a nonstarter. We’re barely coping on our planet of origin. Although many of the problems listed are side effects of unmanaged capitalism rather than society as a whole.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Majority of humans may not have the genetic adaptations necessary however there are some already who can already tolerate much higher temperatures while consuming much less water so there may be some humans that won’t be as adversely affected by the warming planet. It may depend on whether or not they are able to maintain food sources.