It’s a diplomatic reset that would have seemed unimaginable months ago. After years of mutual hostility, Canada and China are beginning to thaw their once-frosty relationship. But **former national security analyst and policy advisor Dennis Molinaro **says Canada’s failure to act on decades of Chinese intelligence warnings has hurt our country’s ability to meet current geopolitical challenges. He speaks with Piya Chattopadhyay about the long and complicated history of Canada-China relations – and the lessons that should be applied to today.

This is a podacst (19 min).

Dr. Molinaro is a researcher at the University of Ontario focusing on counter-intelligence, foreign interference, the history of intelligence and the use of emergency powers in peacetime.

Dennis Molinaro also wrote an opinion piece: China’s secret war in Canada

… the West’s interactions with nation-states such as the People’s Republic of China (PRC), they have been governed by a specific delusion for half a century. Canada … believed that if it did business with China, extended a hand of friendship, China would transform itself into a liberal-democratic country. Trade would lead to freedom. But Canada was wrong. Beijing never considered joining a liberal order and instead used Canada as a backdoor to the U.S. and as a means of exploiting resources and technology.

… The stories of secret PRC police stations in the news a little more than a year ago weren’t a new phenomenon. The PRC had been interfering and seeking to influence the political and civic life in Canada for decades. And Canadian leaders have done little to deter adversaries from operating here.

But how did such a situation arise? To date, Canadians have had diplomatic histories of the Canada-China relationship but an intelligence history wasn’t incorporated into them. That’s necessary if Canada hopes to have a realistic appraisal and understanding of the relationship.

… The China that Canada’s leaders saw and engaged with was one they invented in their own minds. They saw a potential market for wheat and potash. They saw a counterweight to the U.S. They convinced themselves that economic liberalization would inevitably lead to political freedom. They weren’t alone in this thinking, even the U.S. adopted it, though its defences against Beijing were more developed than Canada’s.

… But the truth was that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) used western openness to build its economy and modernize its military. They used western universities to train their scientists. The West dreamed of partnership while China planned for dominance.

… The regime in Beijing operates on a concept of transnational sovereignty. It believes anyone of Chinese descent, regardless of their citizenship, owes their loyalty to China. By this logic, it doesn’t respect Canada’s borders as it hunts its critics in Canada. It harasses the Uyghur community, Tibetans, the Falun Gong, and Hong Kong pro-democracy activists and Taiwan independence supporters. It uses threats against family members back home to silence dissidents in places such as Vancouver and Toronto.

… This is transnational repression. It’s a foreign state enforcing its political will on Canadian soil … The United Front Work Department is an arm of the Chinese Communist Party tasked with influencing foreign elites and controlling the PRC diaspora abroad. Its goal is to make foreign decision-makers sympathetic to Beijing’s interests, and it cultivates relationships with influential figures at all levels from school boards to Parliament. In return, it expects support for China’s interests and silence on its indiscretions. During the April 2024 Hogue inquiry into foreign interference, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service reported that it believed China interfered in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections.

  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Oh Glide, you adorable little rascal. Should try reading the drivel your wrote when you’re sober. The only one doing straw man bullshit here is you I’m afraid. Thanks for confirming that you are just a racist troll with an axe to grind though. Life’s gonna get hard for human garbage like you going forward, and I’m here for it. If my presence here makes you uncomfortable, that’s tough. Get used to it little fash.

        • Glide@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          No, but I do remember not wasting my time reading a pile of drivel from dubious sources.

            • Glide@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              You know what, that’s fair, you got me on this one. I did not even look and dismissed the things you posted as obviously biased because I don’t trust you. Though, let’s be honest: why wouldn’t I? Let’s go take a glance at the time you linked me a pile of “sources” regarding China’s state as a dictstorship. I’d go grab you a link, but honestly, you’re not worth THAT much time.

              Oh look, a pile of opinion articles where citizens of China were asked if they think China is democratic, and of course, thanks to the stranglehold over the spread of information in China, the people permitted to answer largely said yes. Meanwhile, the American people rightly pointed out their democracy has been falling into a dictatorship. The benefits of having enough freedom to speak up, even in a nation that is working hard to become as authoritarian as China, are suddenly apparent.

              The only “data” I’ve ever seen you direct anyone to is cherry-picked, misrepresented, or otherwise untrustworthy. You’re right, I shouldn’t have attacked your sources without seeing what your sources actually are, as that gives you an opportunity to put egg on my face. I still haven’t wasted my time checking what version of lying you’ve engaged with in your link in this thread. But that’s exactly the point: it’s coming from you, so doing so is a waste of time.

              I’ll take your point. There are better reasons to remind you, and anyone else in this thread, that every time you post “facts,” we’re all better off ignoring you and moving along than your sources being sometimes dubious. Sometimes it’s cherrypicking. Other times its the misrepresentation of data. This is why we have the word “lie.” It’s a nice catch-all for tankie trash.

              EDIT - Wait, no, I lied, I decided to actually follow your link. I got curious.

              What the fuck are you even talking about? I’m not in that thread. You weren’t talking to me. How can I "slither away’ from your argument if I’m not even in there? Are you delusional, or just making even more shit up that I thought?

                • Glide@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Let me guess, hypocritical projection? I assume all your “facts” are written by deepseek, then. It would explain the way you skirt actual points while cherry picking Chinese state propaganda.

                  Speaking of skirting points, you’re just going to try and misdirect from the fact that I’m not even in the thread you claimed I ran from? Lie better, Yog. It’s going to get harder and harder for your .ml buddies to pump you up if you keep embarrassing yourself like this.

                  • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 hours ago

                    Thank you for taking your valuable time away from huffing gas to make this insightful comment. Stay mad little fash, I’ll be here all day to make you miserable.