Biden earmarked billions for former coal communities in Appalachia – and his successor came and took it away

For a moment, Jacob Hannah saw an unprecedented opportunity to make Appalachia great again.

In 2022, the Biden administration earmarked billions of dollars to help revitalize and strengthen former coal communities. The objective was to lay down building blocks for the region to transition from extractive industries like coal and timber to a hub for solar and other advanced energy technologies, with a view to long-term economic, climate and social resilience.

But on his first day in office, Donald Trump scrapped Biden’s clean energy and environmental programs, which he lambasted as woke, anti-American liberal hoaxes.

  • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Are these the same people that voted for Trump in 2016 because Hillary said she was going to fund training and retooling for them to move into renewable energy and ended the speech by saying she was going to put coal mines out of business?

    • Vegan_Joe@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Not that people shouldn’t be held accountable for their politics, but, as in everything, the issue is more complex than it seems that face value.

      I was placed in the region through Teach for America a decade ago, right in the midst of the first Trump election. I initially took the political rhetoric at face value, assuming everyone was parroting the viewpoints of conservative talking heads.

      While there is some truth to that, the actuality of any individual’s opinion is more nuanced than that.

      The area has been historically marginalized and abused by corporate and political powers of all varieties. Coal severance money was misdirected, and many of the mine owners saw the writing on the wall, taking all available funds and abandoning the area.

      As a consequence, the working class was left with few jobs outside of healthcare or education, with a consequent over-reliance on government assistance, leaving the populace with a feeling of hopelessness and abandonment.

      The fall from prosperity happened with a similar, and related, flight to large cities. From the viewpoint of the marginalized, it seemed as if liberal policies favored Urban prosperity over rural.

      Not that the issue can be whittled down to the urban and rural divide, but the overwhelming sense was that something drastic needed to change, and only one political party even acknowledged that sentiment.

      The area has certainly been propagandized to, but most of the opinions are more moderate and practical than the election results would imply.

      Like much of the country, it is very easy to find the vocal minority that treats the political scene like a sports match, with an almost religious devotion to “their team”. I just wish there was more condemnation of those people who address it that stupidly.

      With it being such a rural area, the community relies on each other, and easily looks past any problematic opinions, in favor of meaningful human connection in action.

  • d00phy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Narrator: They’re looking forward to voting for JD Vance to finally get that trickled down wealth.