• notaviking@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe, but if it was a movie who would you cheer for, the massively overpowered enterprise just blowing up a space minivan or the David vs Goliath battle where two friends with a crossbow takes on a US Space ship and triumphantly makes the impossible possible

  • PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, the Millennium Falcon and the Defiant would make for a good scrap, not sure if even that’s too much of a mismatch.

    Maybe the Millennium Falcon Vs the Delta Flyer.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      Considering the number of actual stations, the delta flyer is the only fair match to the millennium falcon. The defiant still has a crew of about 80

    • Sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      They’d probably hold the Falcon in a tractor beam. We know the Falcon hates tractor beams.

    • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is actually a very funny video on that on Youtube somewhere. Short version: Picard is wholly unimpressed.

  • neatchee@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly an X-Wing would likely fare better than the Falcon. Proton torpedoes, and small enough to evade their turbo lasers phasers

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      You do know those phasers are at the speed of light and auto target, right?

      You can’t really dodge them, only deflect them.

      • neatchee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I was making an admittedly weak reference to the death star trench run dialog. Not serious

        Honestly I find these types of questions silly since we have no way to compare the efficiency and efficacy of the different weapon and shielding types, or other on board tech and countermeasures.

        For all we know the falcon’s shields absorb phasers like they’re paper and its turret lasers eat the Enterprise’s shield at 5% per bolt. Or it could be the other way around. Not to mention this completely ignores tactics and strategy which is a huge part of it. The Falcon doesn’t do direct confrontation for a reason. Han is more likely to try to fake a surrender and then pull some shit once aboard for negotiations.

        And if we’re just gonna say “Trek tech is more advanced than Wars tech” we can just end the discussion there 🤷‍♀️

        • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s really hard to compare fantasy and sci fi too. Space acts different in star wars, it has wind resistance like properties as an example.

          • neatchee@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Totally. The fact is, once a society is beyond intra-stellar travel, with craft that do not do atmospheric flight, there is little reason not to go full borg and have ships with no real forward-facing direction to speak of