Microsoft fires Joe Lopez for disrupting Genocide-profiteer Satya Nadella during Microsoft Build Keynote speech and bans words like “Palestine”, “Gaza” and “Genocide” in all company emails!!! Yet another chapter in a long tale of Microsoft’s intimidation, retaliation, repression, and censorship culture.

Source - Tools to view without account.

  • ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    A company[1] excommunicates a worker[2] for disrupting work[3] and having not worked for the amount of time the worker was disrupting the work.

    At least logically sound.

    It is not a community. It is not a non-profit, community oriented company. It is a company that does whatever it does, for money and power for itself ant not for anyone that gives power to it.
    It is to be expected.


    Why did companies start getting power over the people more than the organisations that are supposed to be for the people?


    1. which is basically a dictatorship by the top management, for the top management ↩︎

    2. that is here on paper, to work and nothing else and be paid for that ↩︎

    3. as is defined by the top management and not by any other entity ↩︎

    • pyr0ball@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      14 days ago

      You’ve got it backwards. For most of history it was the other way around. We got to see a brief tantalizing glimpse of it in the 'oughties and naughties, and then the people who’s lifestyle depends on an exploitable workforce got scared and decided that was enough freedom for the peons

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        But wasn’t it that for most of history, there were no such pyramidal corporations and the only ones that were, were full-blown kingdoms, with the more trade-oriented ones, being more co-operative than corporate?

        While trying to articulate my thoughts, I realise how lacking my historical information regarding this aspect is. I guess there might have been more corporate entities during the reconnaissance.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yeah, actively protesting about your employer has a pretty predictable outcome. They had to know that going in (and props for having the balls to do it) but I doubt they were surprised.

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        Well, at least giving MS props for “being the whole removed”, as Louis Rossmann would say, instead of trying to give some other, 2 faced explanation for the firing.
        Or did they?

    • Pro@programming.devOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      The source is the No Azure For Apartheid post.

      You literally hear about them everytime a Microsoft employee disturb a event/ publicly protest Microsoft actions.

              • RangerHere@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                12
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                With all due respect, no company in the world has to pick sides. They can choose a side or do nothing. If you don’t like what they are doing, you can boycott them.

                I don’t see anything wrong with Microsoft silencing Palestinian protesters after what they did in some public and some private events at the company.

                • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  I hope you will never be victim of the consequences of your own shortsighted thought.

              • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                14 days ago

                Defending what? You’re the one with a single source of nonsense. Get a better source and I might believe whatever this post is trying to project.

              • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                14 days ago

                Says the one who believes single sources on the internet, as long as they fit their belief.

                You’re closer to being qanon than you think.

              • teslasaur@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                I merely pointed to the fact that a single instagram is a pretty shitty source of information. I stand by that reason.

                Whatever got verified after the fact doesn’t invalidate wanting better information before falling for ragebait 🙂

                • MadhuGururajan@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 days ago

                  You outright called it bullshit and got pissed when people were rightfully calling you out for ignoring mainstream news channels covering it.

                  “got verified after the fact” maybe you shouldn’t jump the gun and equate unverified info as “ragebait”.

                  Edit: You also seem to not understand that this came out of an established source of info that is usually accurate.