• lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh, it’s been a week on my side, sorry.

    Do you see u/Ofiuco@piefed.ca’s comment? Because they made quite a good argument. Software isn’t as neutral as I made it look. There are features like blocking entire instances that can benefit different instances differently and I don’t think it’s coincedence that they promise and don’t deliver on it. Also they do claim donations for software and hosting but how much they need and how much they get is anyone’s guess. This is all basically a TLDR of this comment.

    • cloudskater@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ahh I see. So while there are multiple instances of Lemmy, all of which are under the shitty devs’ thumbs at the end of the day, the mentioned Piefed and kbin are totally different things by different people with similar functionality but no bigotry? Or are they just different instances OF Lemmy like I’m posting from right now, in which case, what makes those two special?

      • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Piefed and mbin (I think kbin is dead and mbin the successor) are on the level of lemmy in the sense that they are the software and there are different instances of them. So you don’t just join piefed but you join one instance of piefed.

        From my understanding, neither is even a lemmy branch but both are their own software using the more general fediverse protocol (that also includes mastodon and others) so they are compatible, look similar but have different developers.

        And protocol refers to the data exchange format in a way. Think of it as a chess computer that outputs moves in the standard notation. Two computers can play chess together no matter how differently they are built and programmed inside as long as they agree on the communication. Same here. You have posts, comments, up and downvotes, … but that’s just the protocol. The program can work very differently. It’s even possible to post from mastodon on lemmy (not the other way around tho because mastodon doesn’t allow it, not for technical reasons) that’s how different software can be and still communicate.

        I hope that makes sense.

        • cloudskater@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yeah, I think that makes sense, thanks so much for the explanation. I should ask though, in that case, should I move myself over to one of those services? If so, which do you recommend? My account here is only new so now would be the best time for me to switch.

          • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            The whole idea is to spread to different instances. Some have a geographic focus (US, Canada, Europe, …), some a political leaning or other topics like queerness, literature, traveling, …

            I recently joined anarchist.nexus but don’t really use it yet. On the join page of every instance, you see a list of I think all instances with a description so you can choose which one fits best for you:

            https://anarchist.nexus/auth/instance_chooser

            Also, from my experience on lemmy, it doesn’t hurt to have more than one account until you decided which works best for you. It’s not that you lose any followers like on mastodon.