Context: Modern historians debate and argue over historical events. Meanwhile the sage Vyasa dictating the Mahabharata to Lord Ganesha, showing that ancient historians simply recorded massive, made-up casualty counts - something shared across the globe.

  • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Part of it is that many pre-modern armies also had extremely limited ability to estimate the numbers of their enemies, as they often lacked professional scouting units who specialize in such matters - even some early modern ‘rationalized’ attempts at scouting with collations of multiple scouts’ record-keeping and long-distance observation tools like binoculars, like the Pinkertons in the US Civil War, could come up with double or triple the actual numbers of the enemy.

    On the other hand, Procopius, a Late Roman/Byzantine writer, accuses Emperor Justinian of killing a trillion people (‘a myriad myriad of myriads’ - ‘10,000 * 10,000 * 10,000’), and 50 million in Libya alone. So uh, there’s definitely a taste for big numbers with some pre-modern writers.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      accuses Emperor Justinian of killing a trillion people (‘a myriad myriad of myriads’

      Guy kinda sounds like a dick

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean, Procopius also wrote that Justinian walked around with his head detached from his body in that same text, so it may not be the most accurate of sources.

        (even speaking as someone who fucking hates Justinian)

    • raman_klogius@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also the Buddha had lived for trillion times the theoretical age of our universe (big bang to heat death) before reaching enlightenment

    • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I’ve read a shortened version - I found it lacking in comparison to a modern fantasy novel. I didn’t really care about the characters, their motivations were strange, the build up to the war felt forced, it’s unclear why seemingly every leader in the world cares enough about the brothers’ conflict to send their forces and have them all die, and it wasn’t clear how exactly the heroes were killing so many enemies so quickly (thousands in a matter of minutes I believe?).

      But then, making any sense might be irrelevent for the function of myth.

      • sga@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        you may have read too short a version - the best i can do is a watch some 240 hour video adaptation, which is non canonical as hell, and a russian dub is available online.

        as some one who knows it somewhat -

        it’s unclear why seemingly every leader in the world cares enough about the brothers’ conflict to send their forces and have them all die

        it was a bit more than brothers conflict, think more in line of atla - who should be fire king - ozai or zuko (ccomparison is fair because both are fantasies).

        it’s unclear why seemingly every leader in the world cares enough about the brothers’ conflict to send their forces and have them all die

        that is mostly heavy exxageration.

        depending on “stuff” total death toll of battle could be in range of 100,000. but basically putting any number is just as wrong.