• jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    How confident are you of the date? That looks like a lot of cars, and more modern models, for 1898

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Not very. I typically just do a reverse image search to make sure that if I’m wrong about the date, I’m not the only person who’s wrong. XD

  • Drusas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Processing this image in my mind was an interesting journey.

    At first, it looked like an adolescent, until I zoomed in a bit. Then I wondered if it was the photo or reality that the subject appeared disfigured, as if his face was burned. Then I zoomed in some more and thought maybe he’s just old. Like…40s.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Streetlamps back then weren’t electric, but typically gas (or sometimes oil) - they need to be lit with an open flame before they can start operating. The wick in this case is on a long pole so he doesn’t have to climb up the ladder for every lamp on his route.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Actually, in this picture it looks to me more like morning and he’s extinguishing the lamp, turning off the gas. But I could be wrong.