The BBC is looking for a new head of its Arabic-language service to please Israel lobbyists. Mouthpieces for the occupation had complained it was too quick to blame Israel for its actions. The move is intended to force BBC Arabic to use the same dishonest framing as its English-language services.
The manufactured furore began in November 2025. Pro-Israel pressure groups complained that the BBC Arabic coverage of its ‘war’ in Gaza was “critically different” from English coverage. This meant that it was – this is not satire — “painting Israel as the aggressor” in Gaza.



It’s this Times article https://www.thetimes.com/uk/media/article/bbc-israel-gaza-war-9frnmgrgg
The memo mentioned there is the same one that this Canary article is about. This is the Canary’s source. I am not bringing in anything new here.
Oh yeah turned out Israel killed those children with a failed interceptor missile and then lied about it. Interesting Prescott is willing to use the lie Western media spread as “evidence”.
I’m not reading the rest of that garbage filled to the brim with lies. Safe to say TheCanary has been completely vindicated.
I’m sorry, how is the Canary vindicated by the failings of the source it used?
What source you’re just citing Zionist propaganda without sources. That’s what TheCanary called out.
The Canary’s source for BBC Arabic looking for a new editor and for the “criticism of BBC Arabic’s guests” is the Times article, and the Times article in turn got stuff from the Telegraph. The Canary is not casting doubt on either of those, it is taking them entirely as fact.
It’s citing their lies not taking them as facts.
The Times article linked by the Canary:
The Canary:
You:
At this point I just kinda have to assume that you haven’t even read the Canary article and also aren’t reading any of my comments. Have fun I guess.