• Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    I see the Midwest as more of a cultural region than a physical one. Ohio and Indiana honestly both perfectly fit in with the Midwestern culture, so I welcome them into the “Midwestern” moniker

    Personally, I see the Midwest as a triangle with Ohio, Minnesota, and Missouri as the corners. Kentucky and Arkansas are too southern culturally (and honestly, the southern half of Missouri is too) Oklahoma is almost southwestern culturally, and Kansas, the Dakotas and Nebraska are very western culturally (and honestly Western Minnesota and Western Iowa are pretty Western culturally too)

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      Yeah the transappalachian great lakes region and the great plains. The real question is is west Pennsylvania midwestern

      • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 days ago

        i don’t think you can be appalachian and midwestern, too. i think an argument can be made that the midwest is the mississippi and great lakes watersheds without mountains north of the missouri compromise line

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 days ago

          I agree, and I meant west of the Appalachians, not necessarily including them. This of course does make ohio weird as regardless the vast majority of it is past the mountains but a tiny bit brushes into the foothills.