FishFace

So to you it is axiomatic that the problem is insufficient toilets. You cannot understand that there are people - usually drunk - who will not use a toilet unless they are already inside it. It is not feasible to blanket a city in toilets sufficiently to eliminate public urination, so maybe a multi-pronged approach including discouraging people from doing so is more sensible.

“The transit”? There is transit all over Hamburg and there are three directly outside the Hauptbahnhof.

When they piss on the piss-splashing paint, it splashes them with piss, so they stop. I believe the point is that it sprays back at all angles.

I’m not claiming it’s a magic bullet, but I am claiming that if you think this is about homeless people you are not thinking about drunk people and tourists, who are the genuine target.

The answer is drunk people.

I was once walking home with a drunk housemate who pissed in the street a few minutes away from home. Also “clean” does not enter into it. The street is not clean.

They have walked out of a club with a toilet five minutes ago. How frequently do you want there to be toilets?

The idea is that by putting the risk in people’s minds it’ll be a deterrent, or else by giving people a natural consequence (and also protecting the wall from being stained with piss) it’ll deter repeat offenders.

How does the FBI compare to the federal/national police forces of other countries that makes it more susceptible?

Well I didn’t spot that

I mean maybe it’s just some other formula

Right I’m sure the people who piss in our gateway, mysteriously every Friday and Saturday while bellowing at each other, are homeless rather than smashed out of their tiny troglodyte minds.

Hamburg has a vast number of tourists, which makes it even worse, because tourists don’t have to live in the city they’re pissing all over, nor see again the person they flashed because the fumbled pulling up their pants.

Eating the small pieces of tortilla chip on a spoon with some dip is cereal

Oh cool. I’ve seen similar stuff like extempore but not Strudel, I had no idea this would be relevant to me haha

But I never got into those environments because I was more interested in the algorithmics of melodies which doesn’t seem to be as feasible as algorithmic ambient music.

Hmm, yes. I think we’ve covered all the facts here XD

Ah yes, “you must sign in to view this post”

I put wooden stuff in the dishwasher and it’s fine.

Do not do this to formal wear

Oh, so he doesn’t like it when statements and adverts might influence matters in his country.

Interesting.

Why?

I mean you still touched a boob which is nice

It’s about 3% according to Wikipedia, meaning that government internet censorship works on 97% of people in this way. That means the 3% also can’t discuss what they learn with anyone except online.

If that’s your remaining objection then sure.

When I make that comment I was thinking of a single office.