Unlike their boomer ancestors, the current generations talk with their partners about all sorts of things, not just about sex and dinner. Almost as if they are not only sexual partners but also close friends that understand each other.
TL;DR: Ok, boomer.
It can be both queer friendly and pure brainrot at the same time, these are not mutually exclusive.
Slammed!
From one internet stranger to another: you are valid. For the naysayers no amount of official recognition would matter anyway.
EDIT: Your anger is also valid and justified.
Now pronounce Qt.
Both. If I somehow get forced into the other socks mode, I must stay in it at all costs.
I don’t see how we would make them afraid without any implied threat of violence though. Apart from that, I wholeheartedly agree with you.
I’m pretty sure we all agree that violence is a bad solution. The problem is we’re all out of good ones. What are the alternatives at this point?
The mobile version of Papers Please is exquisite. I highly recommend reading the developer’s documentary of it: https://dukope.com/devlogs/papers-please/mobile/
Hey, a little respect for the developer of PuTTY. (yes, it’s the same guy)
The password cannot contain the Epstein’s client list.
They can have it. We just don’t want to federate with them, which doesn’t prevent them from having their own instance all for themselves.
This is just a meme, right? Right…?
This is a great stance for disagreements. Not so much for an actual danger!
I mean, we’re all taught for the whole life that the fire extinguishers and fire alarms are absolutely off limits. I’m pretty sure that during a fire I would still hesitate to break the glass and press the fire alarm button.
“Facts”? What are these?
For the record, you’ve used en-dash here, not em-dash. These are used mostly for number/date ranges. Em-dash is even longer: — vs – vs -
As a person that has been using en-dash and em-dash for years, this is annoying me as hell that they are used as a telltale sign of AI slop. I’m just a typography nerd, not AI!
I guess them being a holocaust museum doesn’t need to imply they are against it. Good to know who they actually are.
I just love this kind of reasoning. Some people really think that it’s okay if “it’s not literally illegal for me to say this” is the best argument they can come up with.