But unlike those that have fallen to hubris I am built different and should be immune to disinformation!

Thank you.

Edited the post after it came to my attention I got duped, I got had, I got bamboozled by a liar

EDIT:

I’m removing the image (keeping the original text for posterity), but I just completely got had by someone straight up lying.

It’s quite embarrasing, I should’ve been way more skeptical of someone posting an image without sourcing the original paper. Turns out not only is it not a recent paper at all (published June 2025), not only is that table not saying what he claims it’s saying, but the authors have since removed that table altogether from revised versions of the paper!

That’s what you get from reposting someone who has “The Finance Newsletter” in his fucking username, couldn’t have gone well for me.

The moment I’ve learnt chuds like Musk and Sammy Boi treat the speed of light as just a thing that they can solve with sufficient computational power I started treating all their claims like a 5yo talking shit. It’s really all you need to know about them.

He outside tho

Given it’s the Moon a better comparison would be a Greenland colony in EU5 where it costs gold initially and then costs your precious sanity, as you are doomed to ship tonnes and tonnes of food and materials there for centuries because there is nothing fucking there and the whole endeavour was a huge mistake.

Wow, I also now found the migrating to codeberg post. I should revisit Zig.

Wait so they figured how to use renewable energy to create something that still generates emissions? Is this a ploy to get Trump on board with renewables?

It’s one topological sort, implemented here. What could it cost? Ten lines?

This one idk, some of it could be more concise but it also has to build the graph first using that weird seemingly custom hashmap as the source. This function, however, is immensely funny

There’s a standard algorithm for new backends, NOLTIS

I think this makes it sound more cutting-edge and thus less scathing than it should, it’s an algorithm from 2008 and is used by LLVM. Claude not only trained on the paper but on all of LLVM as well.

We’re Still Early never dies

I wonder what actual experts in compilers think of this.

Anthropic doesn’t pay me and I’m not going to look over their pile of garbage for free, but just looking at the structure and READMEs it looks like a reasonable submission for an advanced student in a compiler’s course: lowering to IR, SSA representation, dominators, phi elimination, some passes like strength reduction. The register allocator is very bad though, I’d expect at least something based on colouring.

The READMEs are also really annoying to read. They are overlong and they don’t really explain what is going on in the module. There’s no high-level overview of the architecture of the compiler. A lot of it is just redundant. Like, what is this:

Ye dude, of course it doesn’t depend on the IR, because this is before IR is constructed. Are you just pretending to know how a compiler works? Wait, right, you are, you’re a bot. The last sentence is also hilarious, my brother in christ, what, why is this in the README.

Now this evaluation only makes sense if the compiler actually works - which it doesn’t. Looking at the filed issues there are glaring disqualifying problems (#177, #172, #171, #167, etc. etc. etc.). Like, those are not “oops, forgot something”, those are “the code responsible for this is broken”. Some of them look truly baffling, like how do you manage to get so many issues of the type “silently does something unexpected on error” when the code is IN RUST, which is explicitly designed to make those errors as hard as possible? Like I’m sorry, but the ones below? These are just “you did not even attempt to fulfill the assignment”.

It’s also not tested, it has no integration tests (even though the README says it does), which is plain unacceptable. And the unit tests that are there fail so lol, lmao.

It’s worse than existing industry compilers and it doesn’t offer anything interesting in terms of the implementation. If you’re introducing your own IR and passes you have to have a good enough reason to not just target LLVM. Cranelift is… not great, but they at least have interesting design choices and offer quick unoptimized compilation. This? The only reason you’d write this is you were indeed a student learning compilers, in which case it’d be a very good experience. You’d probably learn why testing is important for the rest of your life at least.

This could be regarded as a neat fun hack, if it wasn’t built by appropriating the entire world of open source software

This shouldn’t be left merely implied, the autoplag trained on GCC, clang, and every single poor undergrad who had to slap together a working C compiler for their compilers course and uploaded it to github, and “learnt” fuckall

Waiting for some promptfondler to complain that this kind of assignment is not really fair for an AI because it has actual requirements.

Here’s a fun exercise: go email the author of that blog (he’s very nice) and ask how much of it he still stands by.

Has someone already done it or should I send the email? Ludic would be delighted I’m sure

I guess my confusion is this – at what point does reality exert any influence on the lies-and-trash accounting? What in the physical reality is the reason they can’t just keep fapcircling the economy forever?

So we don’t have smoking gun evidence that Windows 11 is broken trash literally because of vibe coding. But Windows 11 feels like the most vibe coded thing ever. Nobody cared about Windows 11 working. Microsoft, where quality is job number 55 or so!

I think the timelines don’t quite match for that, when Windows 11 came out the LLMs couldn’t even output code that compiled more than half the time. However, the moment I’ve learnt the start menu was coded in React I knew the age of man Windows was over. I don’t know how good the guy behind it was in internal politics but everyone on the path from the idea to pushing it to main should be tried for treason and sent to hard labour (debugging the Azure web UI).

I think this was the good old artisinal vibe coding of the previous era, where you still had to not care about quality manually.

wasn’t audited (…) prompting the SEC to open their own investigation.

Ye, I guess I should’ve said “investigated” there, precision is important here.

There’s not only no stock-holding public to hold them to account, even if there was and they filed a lawsuit nothing would happen. SEC doesn’t exist.

I guess this is the part I don’t understand - can’t they all just play this game of pretend forever? There has to be something that corresponds to music stopping in your musical chairs analogy, but if everyone plays along forever what happens? Is there any load bearing part of this bubble where real reality can have an impact? If the stakes of calling the bluff are a complete collapse of the stock market then why would any NVidia stockholders call the bluff ever?

So you talk about Depression 2, but do you have any idea of what could possibly be the spark? You compare it to Enron, but Enron got had because they got audited. The AI bubble seems unparalleled in creating fake money from nothing, is there any limit to how long they do it? Tether still exists