16·
2 days agoWhat’s the point of owning more weapons than you can wield simultaneously?
Sounds like you just like collecting guns and are making an excuse, lol.
ObjectivityIncarnate
- 0 Posts
- 863 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: March 22nd, 2024
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
2·3 days agoYou’re welcome!
1·5 days agoWhy miss the opportunity to say “bigly,”
Because the goal isn’t to sound stupid?
Dug a bit, and apparently this seat has literally never been held by a Republican; this is quite the misleading headline.
Her name is “Chasity”, by the way, not “Chastity”.
11·5 days agowanting to sound like an adult when making a genuine criticism is bootlicking
???
- The fact that “mocking terms” is even in your ‘playbook’ to begin with, speaks volumes about you.
- Acting like “y’all” is a component of some high-minded satire is genuinely hilarious. Who do you think you’re kidding?
You’re going to enjoy this, I think (ignore the titles of the videos, this is definitely what @maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone was referring to, and the context makes the bit about WWW so much better:
Each more pathetic than the last, it’s always a hallmark of an infantile mind not worth engaging with, in my experience.
Mature adults can talk about people they don’t like without this stupid playground nonsense.
Asinine ‘doodyhead’-tier ‘nicknames’ for people you don’t like are never appropriate, once you’ve reached a double-digit age. Grow up.
More or less the same way fried chicken ‘became the hallmark of cuisine’ for black Americans: it’s a stereotype, simple as that.
It’s not “sensitivity”, it’s simply pattern recognition. In the US, unseasoned/bland food has been a crack made at the expense of ‘white people’ specifically, for a very long time on the Internet.
I knew that second link was going to be Technology Connections, hah.
6·6 days agoYeah, I was reading this OP, wondering if the poster thought that the end result of successful unionization would be one worker getting a $1 raise, lol.
That’s a straw man, so I’m not going to bother responding beyond pointing out the fallacy. Consider engaging with what I actually said.
No. Also I specifically used the ‘90% of their income’ figure and not the 95% one shortly mentioned thereafter, because I think it’s fair that even those who are struggling the most ought to be able to have some ‘fun’ with their money.
But most people do earn enough to pay for their necessities, have fun, and save. And many people don’t save for later, even though they easily can, in the name of putting more on the ‘fun’ pile.
41·6 days agoMaybe Kamala can end 6-7
It’s already over, lol, you’re showing your age, too.
oled people
It’s a good technology, but they’re not actually sentient, okay?
14·6 days agoGetting the Orange Box for $10 back in the day has to be my all-time best.
It’s not perfect, so you have to do it again tomorrow. /s
It’s also important to keep in mind that a fallacious argument leading to a conclusion does not actually disprove the conclusion; identifying the fallacy just means that if the conclusion is correct, that argument is not the path to it. And if the fallacious argument is the only path to conclusion X, then there is simply no basis for presuming X to be correct at all.
Well, “ackshyually” is actually (:P) rooted in mocking people who pedantically and pointlessly correct others, to the point of being more irritating than informative. The ‘Jimmy Neutron salt’ meme shows a pretty solid example of that kind of behavior:
Red herrings as a type of fallacy, on the other hand are about using something to support an argument that doesn’t actually have anything to do with it. The Wikipedia page itself gives a solid example of this: