ObjectivityIncarnate

1. The fact that “mocking terms” is even in your ‘playbook’ to begin with, speaks volumes about you.
2. Acting like “y’all” is a component of some high-minded satire is genuinely hilarious. Who do you think you’re kidding?

You’re going to enjoy this, I think (ignore the titles of the videos, this is definitely what @maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone was referring to, and the context makes the bit about WWW so much better:

https://youtu.be/Wo2KB1dEDdk
https://youtu.be/53hMYw8LX60

Each more pathetic than the last, it’s always a hallmark of an infantile mind not worth engaging with, in my experience.

Mature adults can talk about people they don’t like without this stupid playground nonsense.

Asinine ‘doodyhead’-tier ‘nicknames’ for people you don’t like are never appropriate, once you’ve reached a double-digit age. Grow up.

More or less the same way fried chicken ‘became the hallmark of cuisine’ for black Americans: it’s a stereotype, simple as that.

It’s not “sensitivity”, it’s simply pattern recognition. In the US, unseasoned/bland food has been a crack made at the expense of ‘white people’ specifically, for a very long time on the Internet.

I knew that second link was going to be Technology Connections, hah.

Yeah, I was reading this OP, wondering if the poster thought that the end result of successful unionization would be one worker getting a $1 raise, lol.

That’s a straw man, so I’m not going to bother responding beyond pointing out the fallacy. Consider engaging with what I actually said.

No. Also I specifically used the ‘90% of their income’ figure and not the 95% one shortly mentioned thereafter, because I think it’s fair that even those who are struggling the most ought to be able to have some ‘fun’ with their money.

But most people do earn enough to pay for their necessities, have fun, and save. And many people don’t save for later, even though they easily can, in the name of putting more on the ‘fun’ pile.

Maybe Kamala can end 6-7

It’s already over, lol, you’re showing your age, too.

oled people

It’s a good technology, but they’re not actually sentient, okay?

Getting the Orange Box for $10 back in the day has to be my all-time best.

It’s not perfect, so you have to do it again tomorrow. /s

Not a bad guess at all.

deleted by creator

It’s relevant context to know that while about 67% of people self-report that they are living “paycheck to paycheck” (meaning they are not actively saving any money), only 30% self-report that they are actually spending more than 90% of their income on necessities.

Point being that the majority of people who aren’t actively saving, are choosing not to, spending all of their extra income instead of saving at least some of it.

As bad as conditions are overall, a significant chunk of people are making it needlessly worse for themselves, and things are not quite as dire as they’re made to seem by sensationalist media that’s quick to report that 67% figure, but never focuses on the 30% one that’s a much better indicator of the percentage of people who are actually having trouble making ends meet.

But I would constantly go, “Asmongold said…”

Must be hard to break off a friendship with yourself, lol

But they didn’t exactly elaborate on what they meant by saying that sex doesn’t implcitly mean consent.

I was pretty straightforward about it, I think. Rape is a ‘subcategory’ of sex.

There’s a difference between the disingenuous act of describing a nonconsensual sex act while deliberately not mentioning the ‘nonconsent’, and claiming that the word “sex” itself carries with it the ‘trait’ of consent.

If consent was part of the definition of sex, then when two people get blackout drunk (which legally makes them both unable to render informed consent) and fuck each other at a party or something, we’d consider no sex to have happened, which would be an obviously ridiculous conclusion that no one reaches. It’s obvious consent is not an intrinsic attribute of “sex”.

ok what do I look like a dictionary

When you write “[word], by definition, is [definition]”?

Yes, you do, lol.