degenerate_neutron_matter

It’s made from the chemicals left over from chemtrail manufacturing.

A lunar eclipse here on Earth is a solar eclipse when viewed from the Moon. :)

It’s not the length of the horns that matters, but how well you can put them to use.

Mostly atmospheric effects, though you get some unique colors during a lunar eclipse.

A CIA employee carefully applies bird poop to your car while you’re not watching. It’s all part of the big coverup of the so-called “birds”.

I recognize a lot of frequent posters, as well as a few people from some more niche communities. It’s nice that the platform is small enough for that to actually happen. I wouldn’t really expect anyone to recognize me, as I don’t comment a whole lot and haven’t made any posts.

This is AI slop. It’s subtle, but the graphical errors in the series of bars to the left and right of “commonly heard examples” are obvious indicators. The radio is a bit messed up too, and the text has a characteristic AI feel I can’t really explain. (I think it has to do with the sizing and spacing of the letters).

It’s an interesting idea, but I’d rather not make any requests at all to the advertisers’ servers, even if it’s done in the background without me seeing the ads.

It looks like they stacked the images by taking the maximum pixel values; any other method should’ve produced much fainter or nonexistent trails. A good way to show just how many satellites there are, but not a realistic depiction of their effect on astrophotography.

Look at the source. If it’s a reliable source, odds are pretty good it’s not AI generated. If it’s a sketchy source, don’t take it as real. All of the tips other people have given to spot AI generated content can help, but as models improve it’ll get harder to spot, and we’ll eventually have to rely on only trusting media from reliable sources.

The focus isn’t really an issue since at that distance everything is approximately at infinity (think taking a photo of two distant mountains; even if one is further than the other they’ll both be in focus).

As for tracking, it probably took some math to figure out where to point, but actually tracking shouldn’t be an issue. Hubble was moving much slower than the Earth relative to the satellite (hence the blurry background) so the tracking speed should be well within its capability.

Still a really impressive photo though!

They scrape data indiscriminately; I’m sure any Epstein files publicly accessible on the internet have been added to their databases. Perhaps they’d be filtered out before being used to train models but I’m skeptical they take that level of care with the data.

Absolutely incredible censorship, I haven’t the faintest idea what the word under that small dot could possibly be.

Yep, though it doesn’t have to use much propellant to keep itself oriented as there aren’t really any forces acting on it, so the only thing to correct is whatever rotation was introduced by the last thruster firing. Just a tiny correction once or twice an hour is needed (which seems frequent, but it’s an extremely short firing, in the millisecond range).

Stop putting your balls in my urn!

They’re based in Canada, and given their privacy-focused approach I can’t imagine they’d implement such a feature.

Wouldn’t this just be unenforceable for any Linux distros not directly owned/maintained by a US-based corporation? I don’t really see how they could force a distro to comply, unless they start going after individual maintainers who live in the US.

It might take them a few more centuries than us to develop the tech, but just because we use chemical engines doesn’t mean it’s the only viable method. I’m sure they’d figure something out eventually.

You’re sort of right. The change in distance from the surface is insignificant, but a spacecraft orbiting a bigger planet has to travel further with each orbit so its speed must be faster to avoid falling out of orbit, even if the gravitational acceleration at its orbital height is the same.

Fuck your AI slop