I was literary complaining in another thread a couple days ago that almost nobody with an opinion on ai was capable of nuance. I’m very happy to have been immediately proven wrong.

You’re solving the wrong problem. An email was deleted without the user hitting delete. It should be for the user to decide when to delete an email, not microsoft.

Dragonfucker was not harmless. If you think they were, then you didn’t hear their opinions about suicide. Needlessly cruel and disgusting.

Turns out, pretty awesome. And for extra authenticity, you should drink your dragon cum from a cock.

I’m going to argue that how you use the lying machine determines if it’s slop, not if you use it.

“Generate a character profile for Alexander the blacksmith.” Slop.

“Ask me questions about Alexander the blacksmith so I can further develop his character.” Not slop.

“Summarize everything I explained about Alexander the blacksmith in the format of a wiki article.” Could be slop, might not be, depends on how diligent you were about not letting the lying machine have creative control. Needs to be reviewed for accuracy of course.

And for the record, I was a DM for years before generative ai was a thing. Running a campaign is ton of work, even with shortcuts. Don’t insult your DM like this.

you’re not wrong.

he’s not diddling kids or sexually harrassing his employees, as far as we know. It’s a low bar but I’ll take it.

I’ve noticed both the pro ai and anti ai camps become increasingly hostile to each other, and if you’re like me and have a nuanced opinion then you get lumped into the other camp.

How else is that brainrot going to spread? Gotta keep the masses blaming each other somehow.

That sounds awesome, actually

Depends on what character I’m wanting to develop at the time, but yeah, a lot of my oc’s are women (although not necessarily female). I like to use the game as inspiration for lore. When I played cyberpunk 2077, I already had a character named V who’s a cyborg rabbit girl, so it was close enough to perfect.

there’s sponsorblock for youtube, so I don’t see most of those either.

So I started to feel bad for the poor fuck and then I saw the name on it

fucking lol, get what you deserve.

objectively wrong in every case. Violence against oppressors does not violate the tolerance paradox.

It’s actually the best walking simulator ever made, as the focus is on, you know, walking places.

now that’s actually cool.

I would not trust that.

laughng?

I looked it up on urban dictionary and I still don’t understand what the fuck you mean.

I do this about things I want to do