

I see what youāre saying, but I think thatās a bit much to expect from a relatively mainstream and (I hate to say it, but it applies) bourgeois publication like the New Yorker. Their editorial line allows them to raise controversy in one dimension (in this case, the particulars of Sam Altmanās character) but not multiple dimensions simultaneously (hey, this guy sucks AND his tech sucks AND youāre gonna lose money). And thereās a lag-time factor, too; seems like Farrow and Marantz were working on this story for at least the latter half of last year. By the time some of the dubious economics such as the bad data-center deals and rampant circular financing were clear, this piece probably wouldāve been deep into fact-checking and unlikely to change much in substance.
We here are on the leading edge of this stuff, not that thatās any great advantage! I wouldnāt expect an outlet like New Yorker to be publishing anything like āthe dashed expectations of AIā until maybe this time next year. And even then, it might still have a personalist bent.


I assign a relatively low probability, non-zero but not much more than 5%, maybe a solid 5.5%, that Yud goes even beyond that and implies that he is the 12th imam emerging from occultation