

Set em, let em be known. Evaluate offenders: ignorance, disrespect, necessity? I think they can be “soft” which I guess is sort of against the idea. I think in life we need to be flexible though. I guess this is all to say - it’s good to know yourself and your needs. You are absolutely welcome to leave spaces that oppress you. Not all oppression spheres can be ignored, and instead must be handled. Not all boundary breakers are oppressive, sometimes things must be met regardless of feelings. Sometimes people break things because they forget (a simple example is dead-naming which I think can happen with people accidentally - it’s sort of an extreme example but it’s what came to mind). Sometimes you need to meet people half-way because that’s just life. You can find a way to honor other people’s boundaries while honoring your own. Thanks for asking, although it felt like it was sort of out of left field =P!
To be honest with you, as someone who has actively been stalked the difference is intent. I think both are ALL UP IN YOUR BUSINESS(!) but corporations are doing it in order to subversively sell pieces of you. While stalkers feel actually quite more insidious and really do pose more of a personal threat. I have seen many people say they’ll never buy a thing they’re advertised. Me too. I want to decide what I buy, your advertisement will make me decide against buying your shit. Cause it’s almost always shit. Stalkers however weasel their way into your lives and show up in spaces they absolutely should not be and are not welcomed. The only way to lose either is to let go of either is to go incognito =P! So I guess in that sense, it’s similar. But stalkers are fucking terrifying, and they can span a variety of faces. Not just some creepo who followed you from the come and go.