Start by taxing everything above 10M dollars, then spread wealth control to all people, than start taxing wealth, not work because if you don’t tax wealth it will again cumulate and we will have to start over.
- 8 Posts
- 47 Comments
Yes, defitinitely. Land is the biggest wealth
Wealth has a value, land can be valued easily, we have data for years all around websites and in government about the lands everywhere. The houses are also like this. You can value a company by the factories it has people it employs etc, money it earns etc. This three is more than enough. The rest of wealth may not count, it is not important.
You cant fix loopholes without taxing all billionaires until none exists, because they will constantly bribe government. Even if you fixed loopholes, they will create intentionally.
Yes, That’s what I am talking about. Income tax, is taxation of the poor
They are already doing this. 'Spending faster than they earn" you are still thinking like income tax. They need to spend their wealth. Staying in debt, like they need to borrow money, what are they gonna do with the money? They still need to buy something which increases their wealth.
So, think about wealth, not income. If you think like this, we will never be able to tax the rich. If that’s what you want, Idk
Like, 75% of billionaires get it by inheritance. Wealth can increase without income, Elon Musk doesnt have an income, it has wealth. A person with a land that 100x’ed in 10 years doesnt have an income, but his wealth increases.
Elon buys Twitter without liqudating his wealth. Similarly, every rich does it. The taxes are mostly paid by the workers, while the rich pays near 0 tax.
You get me?
When you tax wealth, not work, a person with 30K a year income, now has 40K, while the house he wants to buy was 200K, now 150K because people dont want to pay this tax, and they sell their 100 houses.
Taxes are good, income tax isn’t
It comes with stuff like that, because since everybody will have similar wealth, what matters for the most people will be applied.
sahin@lemmy.worldto
News@lemmy.world•Notepad++ says Chinese government hackers hijacked its software updates for months
22·15 hours agoYes. Because i sometimes need it. I hate Windows too dude, but I have to use it, because my company requires it.
sahin@lemmy.worldto
News@lemmy.world•Notepad++ says Chinese government hackers hijacked its software updates for months
22·15 hours agoI really don’ remember why i downloaded it. Generally when I first get my PC, I install programs like Sublime, Notepad++, vs code etc. I use Sublime for most of the tasks and it gets bloated, so I sometimes use Notepad++. I wasnt using for the last months. So I uninstalled it. The Json plugin was better than Sublime as far as I remember, maybe that’s why I installed it.
sahin@lemmy.worldtoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.world•Consequences for hit-and-run on a snowmanEnglish
6·15 hours agoProblem is, we cant stop this.
Yes I agree. It wouldnt be problem-free. What I mean is, you can pay the debt, if your debt was in another currency, you might be in a position that you just cant pay the debt.
Firstly the debt is for a long time. The debt until the next year is 10 trillion. You can pay this debt with wealth taxes if you dont want to print more money. Secondly, USA has to produce. It stopped producing good tech, China nowadays owns every tech production. If it earns money, it can pay this debt.
Thirdly, most of the debt is domestic and to the rich. You can just stop paying this. You are the government dude, you are taxing people’s labor, you are taxing every transaction, most countries have stamp tax that doesnt even exist, you can oc tax this money too, and sometimes governments do this.
We have to tax the rich, even if we paid all the debt, we still have to tax the rich. This is required for justice, this is required for people to love their country, this is required to stop poverty, homelessness. When we have a just society people are going to help their country willingly. But currently, some people are killing others, raping bribing, doing anything and we can do nothing about it, while being hungry.
sahin@lemmy.worldto
Games@lemmy.world•"We don't use it, we have no interest in it" Romeo is a Dead Man's Suda 51 dismisses AI development tools, says AI images and videos "feel kinda 'off'"English
4·19 hours agoExcept, spreading misinformation:)
sahin@lemmy.worldOPto
Just Post@lemmy.world•Working Against Top Tech Until Getting Hired
1·19 hours agolike marketing open source programs, help them build the software
sahin@lemmy.worldOPto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Why Is It Harder To Move People To Open Source - Decentralized Options?
1·21 hours agoI agree, we need to promoting marketing decentralized/federated tools)
This debt is not important dude. You can pay any debt that is taken with your own money. You just cant pay if your debt is in other types, like gold silver or other currencies.
They created this system intentionally, so that they wont tax the rich and they make us poorer by printing money, and they have an excuse for stupid things.
The only problem with paying this debt, is people starts to distrust us dollar around the world, which is what they should do. I checked, and 100% of the debt is in USD. So, the govn can pay it right away.
sahin@lemmy.worldto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•Is your city building a ton of banks and gas stations?
91·23 hours agoMy city is building anything but what humans want. Benches, parks, trees are not built
sahin@lemmy.worldto
Games@lemmy.world•"We don't use it, we have no interest in it" Romeo is a Dead Man's Suda 51 dismisses AI development tools, says AI images and videos "feel kinda 'off'"English
141·23 hours agoAi video and image is useless unless you are trying to spread misinformation easily. There is no usecase. Especially for that much of hype.
It really depends. How much money do you have? What are your expectations? What lifestyle will you live?



Wealth control means giving them the wealth, and not owning by the government. Because when the government owns everything, that means the people in government become rich.
Why does, not taxing moving money end public funding? Okay, it can be 2%, and this is enough.