It’s not when nobody asks you to present facts to support your claims.

Seems simple enough, but how do you start?

This dates back to December 2025 btw.

This is not only a keto thing, I’ve heard that doctors who prescribe ozempic recommend to take protein supplements.

I’d hypothesise that you can insert fucking either between the prefix and the root, or before a stressed vowel.

EDIT: Expletive infixation - Wikipedia https://share.google/broCNIxOgtnKUPvSv

Phonology! My old friend!

I agree with you, but you must know that a high paying job and a degree aren’t reliable indicators of intelligence.

Don’t kink shame them /s

You should try arguments next time

Ya let’s use chrome instead

deleted by creator

I’m told edibles only work if you say the magic words, which are “this shit ain’t doing anything”.

While I generally agree that all Nazis must be punched, this can be counterproductive.

Look what’s going on in France. A Nazi got into a brawl, died from his wounds, and now he’s treated like a fucking national hero. The left in general are portrayed as terrorists.

Don’t underestimate how efficient the right is at playing the victim.

Seems DDOSsed by curious people like me right now

Yeah, let’s throw shit at a potential ally because they are cousin to a criminal!

I think we can assume that among the millions of available documents, some are entirely true, others are completely fabricated, and most fall somewhere in between these two extremes. It would be naive to consider everything as true. We would need to sort through them, but the DOJ has given us no information allowing us to do so. It looks too much like a disinformation tactic not to be suspicious (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood). On the other hand, they took several months before making everything available. One can assume that during that time, they didn’t just sit there with their arms crossed looking at the pile of documents: they likely spent a lot of time modifying documents to limit damage on their end and, in the process, cast doubt on their enemies.

It would indeed be highly implausible for 100% of the documents to be fabricated or AI-generated (and besides, I claimed no such thing), but it is difficult to rule out that some of the available documents are completely fake.

Highlighting this fact is absolutely not ‘helping criminals.’ You say that my hypothesis helps the worst people alive, but can you give me a list of their names? No. These documents serve only to enrage people in a vacuum without pointing a finger on anyone guilty. Very useful for the regime.

Also, it is certainly simpler to believe that ‘all these documents are true’ as you do, but that is not an explanation—and that is not how Occam’s Razor works.

Please note that I am not attacking you or your intentions. I think we’re on the same side.

It’s just a hypothesis. I’m open to counterarguments. Calling someone dumb doesn’t count as one.

Yeah. The article is unfair as it holds AOC to a set of standards much, much higher than any politician in the last 20 years.

Tread carefully, you sound sus.

Are you serious? I’m just throwing an idea here. How can you be so sure all this data is legit, when the DOD had plenty of time to add or remove anything they wanted?

I am NOT a trump supporter, far from it, but I won’t believe something just because it would fit nicely in my worldview.

What I find sus is the fact that they released the files when nothing stopped them from keeping them secret.

He wasn’t murdered. He was beaten up.

The far right has been active in France for a long time, and non violence was never able to stop the movement.

Sometimes, you have to fight back, and I’d argue that violence is warranted against overt Nazis.