• WanderingThoughts
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    And it’ll be used to suppress wages, because “you’re not making new stuff, just fixing some problems in existing code.” That you have to rewrite most of it is conveniently not counted.

    That’s at least what was tried with movie writers.

    • sach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most programmers agree debugging can be harder than writing code, so basically the easy part is automated, but the more challenging and interesting parts, architecture and the debugging remain for programmers. Still it’s possible they’ll try to sell it to programmers as less work.

      • brsrklf@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        but the more challenging and interesting parts, architecture and the debugging remain for programmers

        And is made harder for them. Because it turns out the “easy” part is not that easy to do correctly, and if not it just makes maintaining the thing miserable.

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Additionally, as others have said in the thread, programmers learn the skills required for debugging at least partially from writing code. So there goes a big part of the learning curve, turning into a bell curve.