yeah I remember when they gave me a contract i put my watermark on with an ad of my brand (sometimes called full name).

idiot.

Easily one of the worst takes I’ve ever seen.

😂

Artist attribution ≠ Ads

For fucks sake, why you acting like every comic comes with a red “30% off” banner?

You are against capitalism, and your approach is to remove author attribution, thus fucking small creators. That’s called punching down, and for being so against capitalism, you operate like a good dog.

OP, do you have some kind of humiliation fetish or why is your take this shit?

Do you think that a painter’s signature on a painting is an ad? If I listen to music and the artist states their name, is that an ad? All of these are just a way of saying “I made this”. They aren’t ads in any meaningful sense of the word.

You recommend linking to the source instead of a signature, but you don’t include either in your posts. When someone makes something, they have a right to have people know they are the ones who made it. You should be banned from every community you refuse to credit artists in. You are actively harming this community.

Maybe you should abide by the two posts per person per day rule before you start trying to create new ones.

But do go on and tell everyone how an artist having their name and/or their webcomic’s name included in the image is an advertisement.

Especially when it’s damn obvious that you’re using AI to remove the attribution when you can’t just crop it out. Not just a weasel, but a lazy one at that.

Counter proposal: ban OP from this community along with anyone else who removes artist trademarks from comics they post.

This is hands down the most brain dead take I’ve seen today. Congratulations, you’re wrong more than anyone else! 🎉

Most mp3s have the artist name in the metadata or title. And, even the most rudimentary platforms show this information front and center. It is not an ad. It is a feature we desire. We want to know who made it, so that we can understand its context, its subtexts, and yes, find the artist for more of their work.

Image files typically do not make use of these mechanisms, and certainly the platforms we view them on rarely do. The general convention is to ‘sign’ or watermark it instead.

It is as simple as that. To remove the signature of a webcomic is like stripping an mp3 of all metadata and making the filename a random string. It’s fundamentally an inconvenience to everyone involved. No one wants this.

(This is not to mention that the wholesale removal of attribution and complete divorce of creator and creation serves the ultimate goals of corporations. They’ve done it with food (where does your milk come from), furniture (who made your chair), and now with art (who made this comic?)

You seem to be conflating an ad (buy JokoMolk brand milk!) With attribution (this milk was produced at x farm). Perhaps, if we better understood the orgins of things, we might make informed decisions!)

Better idea, how about a rule to ban people who intentionally remove them?

We’d get better content, and nothing of value would be lost. Least of which is AI slop to remove water marks

If I enjoy a creator, I want to see more of their work.

With people like you, I would have no idea who Neil Kohney even is.

Fuck you in particular.

Is the front cover of a book an ad? Are the credits at the end of a movie an ad?

If a signature is an ad, what is it advertising for exactly? Can you define the word “ad” for us? Imagine hating ads so much and literally not knowing what they are.

So, upon reading further, this is not about watermarks over the content, you are just mad artists sign their work… you haven’t realized yet, but you are a douchebag. My vote is to just ban whoever crops out artist names (or post an image without it and don’t attribute in the title or comments) because that’s a douchebag thing to do. If you hate authors just ask ChatGPT to make you comics, those won’t be signed.