I don’t know why this didn’t occur to me sooner. Even if you just use a junk account to like and subscribe it’s the cheaper version of donating.

PBS Terra, for one, has actual climate change news and science. In addition to all the other cool things, and, ofc, PBS kids.

Here’s the list: NOVA PBS official, PBS, PBS Terra, American Experience PBS, Frontline PBS Official, PBS Documentaries, PBS NewsHour, PBS kids, PBS Eons, PBS Origins, PBS SpaceTime.

  • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    How does that work? Does YT pay out to creators based on the subscriber count alone? I’ve only ever heard “like and subscribe to help fund this channel” mentioned when the videos are monetized (e.g ads or sponsors).

    Or does PBS monetize their videos and uBlock just shields me from that?

    Not that I don’t want this to be true since it’s an easy way to help fund them, but I am curious how (or if) this works.

    • MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      1 day ago

      On monetized accounts (which PBS is) YT pays out creators based on advertising revenue. The way they calculate that is a complex, proprietary algorithm, but essentially it’s based on view count and retention, and skip rate. So subscribing and liking doesn’t actually directly help to fund the channel, HOWEVER more subs and likes usually translates to your videos getting pushed to more and more people (based on a totally different, complex proprietary algorithm), which usually leads to more views, and therefore more ad revenue.

      I’m pretty sure us ad-blocking users are still technically contributing to the ad revenue, but over time it can affect the results that advertisers are seeing, and therefore could effect the amount of money they are willing to spend on advertising in the niche or demographic that your favorite creators fall into.

      Does that all make sense?

      • athatet@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        No. But not because you didn’t explain it well. It’s because the way YouTube does things just actually doesn’t make sense.

          • tpyo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            You explained it just fine with the information available to you. I understood it and I have a hard time understanding the meaning of statements over text

            It’s not your fault YouTube doesn’t share how their algorithms work, so I kinda think the other person was pretty rude in their reply. Could have worded it a lot better

    • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s also YouTube Premium which pays creators a cut that’s more than they get with the ads. I bet they need to accept ads to get a cut of that.

    • Rod_Orm@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      More engagement: more changes algorithm push video to recommended fronthome YouTube website

      • Iced Raktajino@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That gets PBS more exposure, sure, and that’s great because they put out quality content, but do they get paid for that? I’m genuinely curious here as I know little of how YT pays content creators. I’ve had a recurring monthly donation going for years now, and I just don’t yet understand if/how simply subscribing could replace even a portion of that.

        • Rod_Orm@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ads obviously, and people that pay YouTube premium also contributed to monetization but idk how much

          • arctanthrope@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            as I understand, premium accounts are paid out per-user proportional to which channels they spend the most time watching. so if a user spends 30 minutes watching channel A and 1 hour watching channel B, and doesn’t watch anything else, then channel A gets 33% of that user’s subscription fee (after YouTube takes their cut), and channel B gets 67%

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s the exposure, which leads to more ad revenue (in theory, without adblockers). YouTube creators live or die based on the algorithm and two of the main things the algorithm looks at is frequency of posting and engagement. Since Google needs metrics to give advertisers some idea of revenue potential, someone liking your video isn’t nearly as valuable to the algorithm as someone liking, commenting and subscribing (if not already subscribed obvi). As an example, ElectroBOOM just started making shorts of all his old content because he’s in the middle of a big house move and doesnt have time to make regular content which he noticed led the algo to stop recommending his content as much. But as far as just making a junk account and liking every video Google has systems in place to ignore “stale” accounts that don’t actually watch the videos. Ultimately what they want is viewers since eyeballs equals ads equals revenue and everything else is just a way of predicting future views.

    • Zephorah@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Each channel needs 1000? subscribers to monetize at all. And then there’s the algorithm. Searches often include items with more not less subscribers, and monetization flows from there.

      Your subscribe feeds the channel into the algorithm.

      • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Each channel needs 1000?

        500 for first level monetization like members and super chats/thanks/3rd thing

        edit: 3rd thing = stickers

  • WagnasT@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Add PBS Spacetime to your list, it is dope af even if I have no idea wtf they are talking about most of the time.

      • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Love how he ends his videos like the comedians of the 90s did. The comedians would reference some joke from the first few mins of their set just before they leave stage, he always comes back to the word “SpaceTime”.

    • ContriteErudite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      NOVA has started uploading some documentaries. I think the best way we can show them that we’d want to see them upload more of their catalog is to leave comments on the videos asking for that—I know that Spacetime, at least, reads every comment left of their videos, so it’s a great way to contact the creators.

    • Zephorah@discuss.onlineOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yes. You’re the state and defund state sponsored media for being state propaganda.

      In what reality does that present as logical

      More like they were neutral, or tried to be, and were defunded for not becoming state propaganda. No different than NOAA getting defunded to keep people less aware of weather issues as climate change rolls forward.