Data Poisoning could be a tool we use to identify AI that has used copyritten material, or we use it to mess with AI.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/infinite-ai-homer-simpson-cover-songs-poisoned-soulseek/
https://mosis.eecs.utk.edu/harmonycloak.html
https://mosis.eecs.utk.edu/publications/meerza2024harmonycloak.pdf
identify AI that has used copyrighted material
but, that is basically all modern “AI”.
(the only LLM i’ve heard of which actually claims that its training corpus is freely licensed is Apertus…)
We callin it Plagarized Information Stochastic Stupidity now the only PISS you’ve heard of
Adobe claims to only train their image generator, Firefly, on images from their stock library.
lol
One way to push back forsure but we need to refresh the tree of liberty asap
Interestingly, literally zero of the people I’ve seen who word things this way ever seem to volunteer to be the ones doing the watering. Are you going to break the losing streak or are you going to continue confirming my belief that it’s only chicken hawks who say this?
People have actually been doing this to catch plagiarism for centuries, long before LLMs were a thing.
See trap streets for one of the better known examples.
I learned about that from Doctor Who!
This idea is as old as books.
