• Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    As it should. Google is factually responsible for the resulting slop and should be legally responsible for it.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      12 days ago

      I hope for the one-two punch of:

      1. they’re legally responsible for anything the slop machine says
      2. the slop is machine generated, so it isn’t copyrightable

      Also, we got a third benefit if this ruling too. Google said, on the record, that it shouldn’t be responsible because you can’t trust anything that the slop-generator generates. Having that on the record could also be useful in a lot of other lawsuits.