• Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I don’t really mind if it doesn’t break the immersion or lower the quality of a game.

    If it’s some unskipable add or some big billboards for Pepsi in a medieval game, I do mind.

  • mysterious_cake@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Looks like another punishment for buying their games legally. Cracked versions don’t connect to their servers so they wont load ads.

  • Mearcfara@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’d be all for it if it meant the other shit would go away. I’d rather see Mountain Dew (instead of Altitude Precipitation or whatever) in the Sims if it meant no microtransactions and other annoying ads. But it’s EA, that’s not gonna happen, we’ll just get Mountain Dew in the Sims AND ads AND microtransactions.

    U.S. Patent 8246454B2 is a real thing.

  • ThyTTY@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    If the game is not good on its own and requires ads to be profitable… Then it’s not worth buying anyway

    • darthelmet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Thinking in terms of “need” is wrong for a business. They aren’t there to make a good product and the money is just to cover all the costs. Their goal is profit maximization. If there’s profit they could be extracting, but aren’t, they won’t make the numbers bigger and the shareholders will be sad.

      Ads are a gas. They expand to fill all available space. If there’s a place an ad COULD go, then it WILL go there eventually.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Im still baffled by all the money some games make off cosmetics.

          Cosmetics in paid loot boxes are a serious issue, but if you can make money to help pay for your game with non paid lootbox cosmetics, all the more power to ya, but i don’t understand it hah.

  • Asafum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    2 days ago

    EA you’re already known as the worst, you don’t need to prove the point any more…

      • Stupendous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        EA to my knowledge just has shitty business practices. Ubisoft at a minimum had a culture of sexual harrassers, possibly assaulters. Blizzard certainly had rapists. Ubisoft also with the pioneering always online DRM for single player games getting back to the games portion of their evils

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      UBISOFT is trying vie for that number 1 spot, they went so far as help produce a show on appletv+ to spread good propaganda bout itself.

  • HereIAm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    “Fun” to see them go for it again. I remember they had ads in Battlefield 2 for Nvidia and Intel. I can’t quite remember if they said they wanted the ads to be dynamic all the way back then as well or if the one-and-done billboard were intended.

    • ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Running through a bombed out kitchen in a ‘call of battle strike’ game, hesitate when I see the oven is full of condoms and the cabinets full of luxury watches.

  • Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t wait to shoot my way around war torn half destroyed cities with pristine advertising signs in the next Battlefield.