• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    And they expect us to choose data centers? Fucked up. And our elites are corrupt enough to do just that …

    • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Bezos literally said that once AI is good enough, it will solve all our problems.

      That’s what they believe, or at least want us to believe.

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    Slop machines that make everything horrendously expensive or self-preservation? Hmmmm. I know which I would choose.

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly “inevitable” changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.

    • loss of employment? Check.
    • profound change to living conditions? Check.
    • loss of labour productivity - including knowledge work? Check.
    • threathening the stability of the world-wide financial system? Check.
    • increasing likelihood of war? Check.
    • threathening even the continuity of human civilization? Check.
    • threathening the capability to compete on national scales if the change is not reponded to swiftly by governments? Check.
    • Correlated with obscene amounts of wealth concentration, impoverishing the huge majority of people, and disintegrating societies? Check.

    It’s as if AI is used as a distraction. Like the “accusation in a mirror” pattern.

    • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      What I find most damning isn’t that the mentally ill ruling class doesn’t care about us peasants. It’s their utter disregard for the future of their own offspring. Why the fuck are these people bringing new life to the planet they’re actively racing to destroy? Genuinely mind-boggling.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s their utter disregard for the future of their own offspring.

        Also disregard for our living planet and all life on it. Which is, take note, the only place we know in the universe that life exists there.

        It is not only a cult - it is a death cult.

        • AbsolutelyClawless@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I actually don’t find that surprising as much. They will be dead by the time the worst shit hits the fan. Right now their money can still buy them comfort, so all they care about is their sick little games. However, their children and grandchildren will be cooking like the rest of us.

          • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            They will be dead by the time the worst shit hits the fan.

            I am not so sure about that one. Things are already degrading pretty fast.

  • manxu@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 days ago

    If only all choices were this easy! Choosing between AI and climate goals is like choosing between a shit sandwich with a side of barbed wire spaghetti vs a gourmet meal.

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    It doesn’t matter. All available resources will be put into AI. The location of the data centers doesn’t matter, the internet provides access. It can only be avoided by actively prohibiting it globally. But the nations don’t look as if they would be ready to cooperate.

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Give the planet over to a probability matrix which is based on the collective works of lifeforms (us) who require that planet to survive…

    OR choose to keep surviving and creating your own works, on that planet.

  • kernkurios@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just for my synapses, currently fried under this heat dome, the question boils down to this: would I rather suffer a bit more for the sake of AI, or for the prospect that things might actually get better on this planet again? So, it’s a straight-up choice between selfishness and the collective good - and well, we know just how brilliantly those kinds of questions work out for our species :/

  • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ok, but think about all the profits the ai companies are making, and all the tax revenue they will pay to fund healthcare, social security and public schools! /s

  • Zacryon@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Both may be possible if the production of hardware, services and electricity can be performed ecologically meaningful.

  • androidul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    how much time do we have to spend in this era of AI evolution, where tf is the reset button and why hide it ffs