I watch them with the original language enabling subtitles instead, as for example: watching Korean movies dubbed into English (also with bad lip sync) is just weird in my opinion but I know a few people who do this for various reasons: hate how the original language is spoken, or dislikes the audio (due to accent) so they dub them in English, however the cultural nuance is gone since the original audio language conveys what is intended to be expressed.

    • Bakkoda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The dubs NEVER seem to match what I think the person is gonna sound like. It’s so distracting.

  • DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    Subtitles. Even with the best voice actors, something gets lost with dubs. They just never seem to capture the flow and emotion of the original audio. I also like to hear how things sound in other languages, even if I don’t understand the language at all.

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I prefer subs but I can’t read so much anymore so I have to resort to dubs. Luckily German dubs are usually top notch.

  • misk@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Dub is acceptable for some types of animation where translation also adapts it to local culture. And I’d still have subtitles enabled at the same time.

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Only Germans prefer dubbing.

    In Poland it’s super donkey, there you hear the original at half the volume and on top one guy reads the subtitles aloud with a very monotone voice, which is particularly weird during sensual or erotic dialogues between a man and a woman because this guy needs to read both parts.

  • agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    It depends on if it’s animated or not.

    If it’s animated, I can go either way, but if I start it as one of them I don’t switch to the other.

    If it’s live action it’s subs all the way.

  • Hoimo@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I’m staunchly sub-over-dub, but I’m not anti-dub. A good dub is a piece of art, it’s just a different piece of art than the original work. Dubbing is very difficult to do right, especially for live action. It takes good writing to match the lip flaps, good acting to match the facial expressions, and good sound design to match the scene. Anyone can stick a couple bored actors in a studio and record a terrible audio track that sorta conveys the necessary information, but I wouldn’t call that dubbing.

    I really dislike dubs with celebrity film actors. Film acting is much more focused on screen presence, but there’s nothing to see with a dub. A stage actor is generally a much better voice actor, because on stage you have to act so the people in the back can hear your emotions. Picking a big name just shows a lack of respect for the art of dubbing in my opinion, and it doesn’t bode well for every other facet of the quality.

  • amio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I dislike dubbing and always have, subtitles all the way. I’m kinda put off by the [eight seconds of mouth moving] mismatch. It’s also rarely done where I live, except for children’s media. To top it off, it has to be insanely much more work and a lot more expensive. I realize there are relative niche cases where it could be necessary, though.