Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid - welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned so many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard. Nearly forgot to put this up, whoops)


The waterboarding thing was introduced by Vibecampās head of safety at other events, and a lot of the pdku programming seems to be in the area of light bdsm / boundary pushing. imo they work from some base general formula and try and differentiate / create intake funnels for other events.
The fact that itās referred to as a potluck is also interesting because it suggests that participants also had to come up with their own torture method to inflict. I imagine āspend twenty minutes with the sort of person who participates in a torture potluckā was the equivalent of potato salad.
Vice has a writeup - https://archive.is/ooVju - more of a bring-your-own-taser kind of thing I guess
youtube faves are implicated!?
I would not recommend consuming strange powders from these people. Hazing with electricity goes back to club initiations in the 1920s or so.
Introduced by the head of safety (!)
At least they accept the principle that ārelationships across a power differentialā can put the weaker party in a difficult position. They donāt have a rule against this, or a requirement to disclose, but they accept the principle.
It all comes across as Synanon-lite, doesnāt it?