Discord was already succumbing to enshitification. Now with their intention to be owned by Wall Street, that trajectory will certainly accelerate at warp speed once the change of hands happens.

Anyone already get ahead of this and find a solid alternative?

Right now I’m on the fence between Element for Matrix, and Revolt. Both seem to have their pros and cons and I can’t find a clear “winner”.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    20 hours ago

    mumble is great for VOIP.

    Matrix seems interesting, but i think it might be a little bit too heavy handed, im not personally a fan of web tech, though there are other things like xmpp as well.

    revolt is meh, apparently their dev team is hostile to self hosting, so there’s that. There’s also spacebar, which is a reverse engineered implementation of the discord API, could be interesting.

    • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Can you elaborate on what you mean by web tech? I don’t know much about how matrix works

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        a lot of modern technology and software is built on the foundation of work built by the web browser industry, it’s not necessarily a bad thing, but it’s not necessarily a good thing either. Provides a lot of nice features, native integration into a web browser, industry standard security and encryption procedures.

        That’s about it though, Outside of that, running a dedicated version of that app is almost always some bullshit built in electron, which is a horrible buggy mess with horrible performance. Nothing stops devs from integrating these features into a standalone application… But, they likely won’t since they’ve already developed a web browser version.

        I also have some problems with the way web tech is generally built, it’s built with the expectation that you will host and treat it as a web app, which is fine, it works. But i prefer not to host services i use via anything web related as generally i find it both intrusive, and problematic, in the instance that a DNS server goes down for example. (it’s not very likely, i know, but still)

        I also think a lot of the networking protocols are fairly bloated, but that’s not as big of a deal, it’s just annoying.

        anyway, enough of my ranting. Matrix is actually a specification for a set of communication protocols based on the foundation of web tech, it’s highly universal, and inter-compatible, which is great. But it sort of stops there. There are several server implementations, and numerous front end implementations, none of which seem to be particularly, interesting. There’s numerous electron front ends, a few that aren’t (though they won’t support most features) etc, stuff like that, it’s just. Not clean.

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Way too few mentions of Jitsi.

    I use it with friends, it has good server config, and I’m pushing it on businesses.

    • nammi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      they are owned by a Nasdaq-listed company. does that not the defeat the purpose when OP is trying to avoid Wall Street-ownership?

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It’s voice and video calling with chat and screensharing. I intend to use it for a language school. It’s extendable, for instance you can also self-host a whiteboard, where everyone can draw. You can see the drawing in real time, which is good for asian languages, where direction of the stroke is important.

        Free, open-source, packaged in Debian, runs without issues, used it with friends for multi-hour voice chats during gaming nights.

        On the server you can configure things like FPS for screenshare. I have yet to adjust that and try streaming video/game through it.

        • Lumiluz@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          This does sound extremely useful and good.

          I’d say the only issues software like this have is there’s a lack of beginners guides to self hosting, so people either know too little and instantly have their server botted / hacked, or know enough to be too paranoid and afraid to set up their own server because they know of the risks.

          As for me though, I’ll probably look into implementing this and play around with it for our DnD group first.

  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    I’ve also been comparing Element and Revolt. Both seem really solid, both are open source and both are self-hostable. Hard to find any downsides there.

    There’s a discord server that me and a bunch of friends use as our main hangout. They’ve raised the prospect of bailing before things enshittify, and of course I’ve been tasked with pitching a replacement. For my money, Revolt is the way I’m going to go, specifically because it’s basically a one for one clone of Discord. The people I’m pitching this to are a mix of technical and non-technical, so I think something that looks and feels like what they’re used to will be the easiest transition.

    It also feels like Element is geared pretty heavily towards being a replacement for Slack / Teams rather than a replacement for Discord. Their pitch seems a lot more focused on the enterprise market. Revolt seems more focused on gaming, casual hangout, that sort of thing.

    I like Element a lot, but for me it doesn’t feel like the right solution to this specific problem. But if I was pitching something to my work as a Teams replacement, Element is definitely the way I’d go.

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Cancelled mine when they redesigned the mobile app anyway. I don’t want a different interface on mobile vs desktop. I want a unified experience, which was their original purpose.

  • Drew@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Matrix is nice, and you can have jitsi for calls integrated. It seems to be pretty popular; Lemmy has a field for matrix @ in user profiles. Never heard of revolt before.

    • ErrorCode@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I use Jitsi for a non-profit, and I like the mute someone else function, but oh wow the noise cancellation needs improvement. So many voice comm apps have disappeared (there used to be one our group used all the time, then the devs dropped it (the client app) and just became on API or something).

  • shym3q@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’ve started my self-hosting journey having Matrix in mind - especially the Matrix bridges to cut off the need to use social media clients like Discord.

    Today, I’m slowly convicting my friends to join my instance. So far, that’s just one of the closest ones (still win for me).

    I hope one day decentralization in social media would take off!

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I JUST managed to get my closest ring outside my family to join Signal.

      We have a total of 7 people now.

      I’d light up a server and host matrix/frendica/lemmy/mastodon/headscale in an instant if I thought I could get those 7 to join.

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Matrix is the way. It’s federated and you can have your own server.

  • Kuvwert@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ah this is so exciting!

    Discord ‘existing’ has held back development motivation on Foss Federated Communication alternatives.

    When they go public only good things will happen for projects like matrix :)

    I’m very excited!

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Matrix is cool but it really suffers from complexity.

      The spec is a mess because they keep expanding it.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Let’s not mention the abysmal performance for servers. Making it largely infeasible to scale.

        It’s not the solution, not even remotely close, unfortunately.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      I feel like matrix isn’t a one-to-one replacement. It’s a good slack replacement.

      I haven’t used matrix enough to know for sure but does it have the discord equivalent of servers?

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 days ago

        those are called spaces there. but there’s no flexible roles system. also no hop-on voice channels yet, but that’s a client feature so maybe that’s a bit different

  • Turnbomb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Is there any option to stay on discord but better? Like vencord or something similar through Linux? I cannot imagine being able to get my friends off of discord ever.

    • RichardDegenne@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      I guess that’s the biggest hurdle, especially when it comes to social apps. One tech-savvy person wanting to migrate is usually not enough to start moving a community, even as a small as a group of friends.

      • ricdeh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Had to experience that first hand. I tried to get my best friends to register on my Matrix server last September and join a room for our group, and they did, but I rarely see any of them online and I only get responses days later, if at all. One even stopped using it entirely, lol. Ah well, but at least I got a Matrix server out of that that I can use to federate with other like-minded people.

  • pory@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    it’s Element/Matrix if we’re lucky. Revolt is just another Discord - surely this single company will last! With Element/Matrix being an open protocol, it won’t be a “platform” you have to leave when it goes corporate.

    • ParetoOptimalDev@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Sadly I found out yesterday:

      Matrix is not a community-based software, it was born [00] in Amdocs [01], a multinational corporation founded in Israel.

      https://hackea.org/notas/matrix.html

      Many were claiming its impossible to get contributions merged as well.

      I would be happy to find out this information is wrong or outdated.

      • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        89
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, which is good, but the lack of federation is a deal-breaker. It means that you either:

        1. Use their servers - This requires entrusting them with your communities, just like Discord.
        2. Host your own private instance - You can control it, but the lack of federation means it’ll be isolated from communicating with other communities. This makes it really difficult to convince people to use your self-hosted servers.

        Until Revolt adds a way for different instances to federate, Matrix is really the only other option.

        • mamotromico@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I have yet to try revolt, but I thought you could just add stand-alone servers to your client (like idk, mumble). Is a revolt instance a whole separate ecosystem/infrastructure and not just a server entry?

        • aleq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          2 days ago

          My experience with Matrix is that the federation itself is a deal breaker. I have a pretty beefy server and good connection which was getting ddosed by running Matrix and timing out on so many requests for avatars/profiles etc. Maybe I did something wrong, but the whole experience rendered me quite skeptical to the viability of it as a federated chat.

          That said I’ve had nothing but good experiences using it with big servers set up by pros.

          • renegadespork@lemmy.jelliefrontier.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I get why Federation can cause issues (most of the time it’s moderation related), but why would an extra option be a deal-breaker? Federation can always be disabled on a per-domain basis if you prefer. In fact, I’d argue it’s best practice to only allow domains on a case-by-case basis to prevent spam and abuse.

            On the converse, you can’t enable Federation on a platform that doesn’t have it.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              They were talking about matrix itself, not a specific option. And I’m not going to lie, having to hand hold your servers federation choices seems like a hassle. At that point why not just use a self hosted, non federated option?

              • white_nrdy@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                2 days ago

                I think the point they’re making is you can effectively have a self hosted non federated option with Matrix. Just disable federation as a whole (which I’m pretty sure is completely possible. Given companies use matrix for comms, and might not want federation, for similar reasons to what is being discussed here)

          • hobovision@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Why would an optional feature be a deal breaker?

            It also seems like an issue that could be easily solved by whitelisting.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Yes, which is good, but the lack of federation is a deal-breaker.

              The federation itself is a deal breaker

              Why would an optional feature be a deal breaker?

              Because the person they’re responding to said the lack of the optional feature was a deal breaker for them on a different piece of software.

              • pseudonaut@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                I’m might be being dense but… Still: why would an optional feature be a dealbreaker? You just restated, you didn’t address the confusing logic.

                • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  50 minutes ago

                  Go ask the actual person who said it was a deal breaker for them, I can’t explain it more simply than I have.

      • drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        2 days ago

        That doesn’t really change that it’s one company hosting it. Unless you’re willing to make 10 different accounts because your super-FOSS friends aren’t willing to join each others instances?

        • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          I guess the easy solution here to to make it use oauth2 authentication. Then you can just authenticate using one account elsewhere. If fediverse services also at some point become oauth2 providers, then even better.

          • Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s still not a solution. That entails non unified communication, access, and search. Making it easy to log in to others still doesn’t solve easy sharing between others. Also oauth2 is a pain to set up, and many people hosting their own instance aren’t going to bother.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Sorry but what exactly do you communicate and access between discord servers? Are you talking about PMs which are by default independent of servers?

              Unified search could easily be achieved through third party tools at the least, like for IRC. I don’t think even discord has unified search between servers.

              • Tekhne@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Oh hey, you’re totally right, that’s crazy. I use Beeper (hosted matrix setup) to aggregate my chats and I guess I’ve always been using that to search across all servers without realizing. Fully thought the DM search would also search across servers.

                DMs are definitely also another case though - you can’t easily DM people on another server if that requires you to log into another server.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  That’s true about DM, however DMs are not a core use-case for discord-like services. It’s the group/voice chats etc. I could see a workaround like lemmy does, where if you want to DM a user in another server, you might be able to do it through your fediverse instance (i.e. a DM simply has your fediverse instance DM their fediverse instance), but I’m sure there can be more elegant things like. However DMs by themselves are a weird thing by themselves, so much so, that even bluesky had to bolt DMs on-top and outside of their protocol.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thank you for the recommendation. I tried element a while ago and found it lacking. Matrix must be the way forward. Disregarding IRC of course.