• 0x0@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    90% of people with no money or a roof over their heads and a lot of time on their hands?
    Maybe some will realize those mantions have food.

  • Peacepath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    If 90% of people don’t have a job, the state has to provide them an income. With that income, they can still consume. Public spending for private profits, as usual.

    Of course the system isn’t sustainable, but it wasn’t before AI either.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    23 hours ago

    That’s someone else’s problem. They only care about making money this quarter

    Same as if all of civilization collapses because of climate change caused by global warming. It’s someone else’s problem, they’re just making money for themselves right now. Consequences are for the government that only suckers pay taxes into.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Naw, flawed argument, they steal our resources and then fund themselves by illegal and manipulative means.

    Also the economy is shifting where the top 1% are moving closer to being 50% of spending, making the argument rather void.

    • LazyBaby@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This isn’t really sustainable though. Regardless of how rich you are, you only really need 1, maybe 2 pillows. You can only get so many haircuts in a year. They do absolutely need the poors.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        No, but you do, and guaranteed that as they buy up and shut down competitors they will squeeze you for everything you’re worth over largely inelastic demands like pillows, or medicine, or soap…etc

        Also haircuts? Haircuts, unless we’re really that deep in corporate hell, are between you and the barber/shop. Billionaires aren’t cutting your hair, the person cutting your hair, the person who owns the salon or barbershop ever, is a peon just like you and me. Small business owners are in the same class as us.

        • LazyBaby@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s increasingly not true. Local businesses barely exist anymore, soon your only option will be, like, great clips. Not sure what you mean about squeezing over inelastic demand. They can raise the prices of a pillow but they can’t make a profit when only 1% of the population is buying pillows

  • speaksintv@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    22 hours ago

    If 90% of the country is unemployed they’ll work for us and we increase the UBI they pay us.

    Or we have a very abrupt reordering of things.

  • mecen@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They can sell to each other and centralize luxury and technology in their circle.

    Mega corpos don’t need poor consumers.

    Edit:

    Corpos want deregulation, monopolistic/cartelic market position, unaffordability for average people for education and technology.

    • SupahRevs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agreed. We are already kind of there. We have enough food to feed everybody but the people who access it are those with enough money. Profitable food is what gets investments, not healthy food. And what we see more and more is that profits are not driven by feeding the best quality to the most people.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    How come these C-Suites never consider AI for the positions it would probably be best at: their own.

    Isn’t it funny how the “human employee removal ray” is never aimed at them?

  • ImWaitingForRetcons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    The top few percent spend do much more money compared to everyone else that the top companies will happily continue targeting them and making money hand over fist even if the bottom 90% can’t afford shit anymore.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    2 days ago

    Question:
    How is Big Oil™ going to make a profit when the world is ruined and the population are dead?

    Answer:
    Lol, don’t care. That’s someone else’s problem.

      • Napster153@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Because look at the age of those in charge. A majority are ancient, and they know they are dying.

        They are trying to take their riches with them, like the Pharoahs of old.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          And the rest have golden parachutes waiting for them regardless of how good or bad they actually end up being at their job

  • red_tomato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    3 days ago

    If that ever happens I see three possible options:

    • Universal Basic Income
    • Communism (money is abolished)
    • Societal collapse
    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Two of those are communism and everyone knows that the owner class will never settle for not renting the ashes to us

          • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ukraine is (also) a climate war. Fertile soil and continental climate (less affected by the loss of the AMOC). Syrian civil war was partially a climate war. It’s already kicking it off but we simply don’t see it. All we see are Hitlers.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to socialism or regression into barbarism

      - Friedrich Engels

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Eh, the third bullet could mean anything from solarpunk anarcho-syndicalism to cyberpunk anarcho-capitalism. It could also just mean a Mad Max style fight for survival.

          Technofascism falls under cyberpunk anarcho-capitalism, obviously

      • degen@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Bro the 21st century so great we had to make new concepts by smashing all the old ones together

          • degen@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Techno feudalism is how I’ve always heard it, but neofascism is hilarious because I feel like it’s the one thing that doesn’t change at it’s core. Like we have neonazis but the fascism is basically untouched

            • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yeah I was just being a bit facetious by switching the prefixes and roots. My original comment said “neofeudal technofascism” but then someone complained about remixing concepts so I replied with “neofascist technofeudalism” or whatever I said

    • paranoia@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You forgot extermination of the poor (i.e., all workers) using the control apparatus being constructed, which actually still could leave a society.

  • Atomo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    So obvious it hurts. That’s why these morons should read Marx, who provides a clear blueprint on how capitalism works. It’s all there!

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Heard that CEO tenure is historically lower than it’s ever been. So their response is, “sounds like the other guy’s problem…”

    Kind of seems like that’s part of the problem? But what do I know, I’m just a toddler that stole Mommy’s phone and typed this quickly before she found me and 6&__++3GFd GGG vgggvfh42467!:"hhhghgjjj!!!