• mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 days ago

    The Supreme Court of Missouri has ordered the Secretary of State of Missouri to appear in person at a contempt of court hearing today.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      Well, don’t leave us hangin’! it’s 2:35 PM central time right now; did he show up?

      • mkwt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        13 days ago

        The court found that Hoskins was in contempt, but he managed to purge the contempt by hearing time. (i.e. he came into compliance with the court order by directing election officials to use the 2022 map.)

        • _stranger_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          13 days ago

          absolute coward. The court should have deputized someone to drag his ass in regardless.

          No way in hell I get a free pass for telling the judge “I totally stopped speeding, promise, so Im gonna skip the court showing”

    • mrmacduggan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      13 days ago

      I sent this to my buddy who is an organizer and solicitor for the petition, he’ll be chuffed.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    13 days ago

    If I were a betting man, and I’m not, I would put all my bitcoins on Missouri using the new maps for midterms with zero consequences.

    • GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 days ago

      That’s what Ohio did. Their maps were ruled unconstitutional, then they just did absolutely nothing to fix them and when the midterms came around they said “well we can’t just have an election with no maps at all, we’ll just go ahead and use these unconstitutional ones for the time being.”

      • watson@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah, I remember reading that a while back. Republicans are above the law. There are always warnings, but no consequences when they ignore them.

    • rynn@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Possible Silver lining, maybe the Supreme Court knows the new maps are bad for republicans so they want to strike them down before they shoot themselves in the foot?

      Why would this court actually do something on principle in this case??

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        They hope that if they give true bipartisan decisions every once in a while, it will prevent the courts from being packed when Dems take office.

        This one is a no brainer. Go against the Missouri SC for a net of 2 seats? Not with it.

  • Rhaedas@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    We so need an independent organization that determines every few years actual district mapping across all states that is based on real data and not by the state officials to retain their power.

    Oh, right… reality favors the left, and Republicans would only have a few places they still dominant. Yeah, that’s not fair.