• treesquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Funny take, because they wouldn’t be shown branded content AT ALL, unless people voluntarily followed the brands. Then, if those brands spammed everyone’s feed and everyone saw it all and it overwhelmed them, then people would unfollow those brands. You would only see what you wanted to see, from the people and organizations you wanted to see it from, and you’d see everything they posted, rather than a black box algorithm choosing what to amplify, what to hide, and what to insert into your feed. No algorithm sounds like heaven.

  • belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not if you dont follow the fucking brands…

    The call is coming from i lnside the house. The point of shitty algorithms is to keep you scrolling and accidentally clicking ads

  • alpha1beta@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    What he really means is you’ll see more native posts from brands, and not see as many ads, because they hide posts from brands to force them to pay to reach their own followers.

    Everyone at Meta can fuck themselves to death

    • alpha1beta@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’ll share a short story of how the algorithm sucks. A friend’s mom was dying of cancer. I knew it would be within a few days or week. He was texting me a lot - but in random bursts - trying to distract himself from the inevitable. I scrolled through IG, thought I saw it all, and having not heard from him in a while, I texted him something somewhat goofy.

      He texted me back, “My mom just died”. I had no idea. Sure enough, scroll another 5 minutes and buried at the end of my feed is his post from less than 2 hours ago.

      Instagram made me look like a dick because they’d rather show me 26 hour old content, than 2 hour content.

        • alpha1beta@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          He had a few more urgent things to handle. I’m sure I would’ve gotten a call or text hours or a day or so later. But the algorithm decided that it didn’t want to show me sad news and would rather send me engagement bait.

      • jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        4 days ago

        You used your feed for info, rather than looking at his profile or asking him politely. That’s not on Meta - that’s on you.

        • alpha1beta@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          That’s the dumbest possible response, but I see you’re just a troll.

          And FYI this was right as they swapped out the original the chrono feed. I was vaguely aware it was happening, I don’t know if I knew it had rolled out to me yet. I had only had a sneaking suspicion he’d post it there. And as I mentioned, I knew she had days to maybe a week. It would’ve been one of the top posts in a chrono feed.

          Meta, decided, for their own gain, to change how their app worked, with essentially no warning, no choice and no transparency - wasn’t like there was a big notification saying Your Feed Changed. The only thing different visually was the order of the timestamps.

          For anyone else, I’ll leave another example: https://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2014/12/24/inadvertent-algorithmic-cruelty/

            • alpha1beta@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Are you missing a chromosome?

              What do you actually think would happen here? That a friend would text me within, idk, 1 to 4 hours of his mom dying? I think he’s got bigger problems - calling a funeral home, or just dealing with the grief.

              Was he supposed to text me before the body was cold?

              Or was I supposed to text him, either hourly or before I say anything else, “Hey, if your mom dead yet?”.

              I didn’t go to Instagram LOOKING for this information. But it was there. As this was when the algorithm was new, I had a decade of experience with IG to expect that if there was anything recent, a quick scroll would surface it, but I was also doing the same thing I’d do a couple times a day.

              But IG manipulated my feed, ruined the experience and caused an awkward moment.

              • jsnfwlr@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                What do you actually think would happen here? That a friend would text me within, idk, 1 to 4 hours of his mom dying? I think he’s got bigger problems - calling a funeral home, or just dealing with the grief.

                No, I expected you to text him with “hey mate, haven’t heard from you in a bit, hope everything is as good as can be”

                And given what he is going through, don’t send him “goofy” texts…

                You’re still blaming a website for your lack of social intelligence. And insulting me for pointing it out to you.

  • Juice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’d never considered how the algo might actually be improving user experience.

    I still haven’t considered it, and I never will, but I never had

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    in an algorithm-free world

    What do these people think the word “algorithm” means? Something something dihydrogen monoxide.

    • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Engagement-based content recommendation algorithm. As I am sure you well know.

      This is like asking people what they’re complaining about when they’re complaining about AI. Like yes, the term is very broad and technically encompasses non-neural-network decision making logic, but you know damn well what I’m talking about.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Algorithm means Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi. His name was transliterated into Latin as Algoritmi and from there into English as Algorithm.

      Using ‘algorithm’ to refer to anything other than the person is linguistic drift and therefore utterly unacceptable. Even if you’re “pulling an Algorithm” by relying on his mathematical work, then you’re pulling an Algorithm every time you use the number zero. Using “(pulling an) Algorithm” to refer only to a structured set of mathematically precise instructions is just so ignorant.

      Anyway, what were you saying about people being dumb for using “algorithm” in a different sense than how it was used previously?

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Meanwhile here on the Fediverse/Threadiverse, people are doing fine without an algorithm other than just boosting someone else’s post.

  • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 days ago

    Wouldn’t they only see that if they followed brands? When I left ig a few years back besides the ads every three posts my home feed was just my friends’ posts and I could scroll to the end (all caught up) in 10 or so minutes if I checked it once a day

      • cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Domino’s has been doing it for years on Reddit, for example. Lots of “goofy” posts like the Domino’s driver dancing on a customers porch because they asked him to through their door-bell camera. Dumb stuff like that.

        To say nothing about all the brand discussion about Marvels latest projects on their. 100% Disney is paying for an encouraging that pseudo-advertising behavior.

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    Last time i saw a friend using instagram, about every 3rd post was sponsored… So not much different?

  • CombatWombat@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    Actually, funny story, if you post more often actually people find it kind of irritating and they block you

    "What ends up happening is the best way to get more reach is just to post more often and those who can afford to post the most often do and then therefore get the most reach,” he said.

    “And it turns out your friends post a lot less than creators, who post a lot less than brands and companies.”

    • neatchee@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah the behavior they’re talking about is enabled by their algorithm. Without big brother curating how much of the content makes it to your feed, people just stop following spammy accounts.

      It’s presented as convenience (“we’ll manage that for you”) but it’s actually manipulative (“we’ll tune it to exactly as much as you will tolerate”)

    • hiphopheaven@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Actually, funny story, if you post more often actually people find it kind of irritating and they block you

      You are right