• AntY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I thought it was the other way around. The thickest part of the can is the top, followed by the bottom. The sides are much thinner. I thought the reasoning behind switching to tall and narrow cans with the same internal volume was to save on aluminium.

      • Redex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tops are pretty much standars size on all cans I’m pretty sure. So that part should be constant.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          That looks like a 202 vs a 200 can end, so a “sleek” not a “slim” (red bull can is slim)

          The sleek can is 355 ml and uses a 200 end.

          As for which uses more aluminum… Good question. It’s probably close

    • frank@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s definitely more surface area per volume, but a 200 vs 202 lid and a smaller hermetic seal cancels some of those losses. Sidewall is cheap aluminum wise, but you’re likely right in that it’s a little more aluminum. Definitely costs more to make since they do fill a little slower.

      Also fuck coke, what a bunch of assholes

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The larger diameter of the original can plus the angled transition at either end probably means same surface area of aluminium. Small diameter differences make larger circumferential changes.

        • frank@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          They do, but overall the can end (lid) is a LOT more aluminum than you expect and the whole rest of it isn’t as much as you expect.

          So a little less lid is worth a fair bit more sidewall in terms of weight of aluminum

          • schnapsman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Since they apparently have the same volume, could one of you be a hero and steal one of each and weigh them?