I haven’t gotten around to spinning it up yet, but I was just looking into this myself and was going to try out Pinchflat. If anyone has used it and has any feedback I’d love to hear it.
Development is semi-frozen. The developer is also more hostile and they need to be even to contributions from others.
And it does not store your files in a way that is self-contained. And there is no option to control the naming or organization of the files it stores.
Your file system should be navigatable and understandable without having to run software and pull information from a database in order to interpret it. Tube Archivist is far FAR from ideal media archival software IMHO.
It misses the mark in so many ways it drives me insane.
I haven’t gotten around to spinning it up yet, but I was just looking into this myself and was going to try out Pinchflat. If anyone has used it and has any feedback I’d love to hear it.
I was between it and Tube Archivist.
Definitely not tube archivist…
Development is semi-frozen. The developer is also more hostile and they need to be even to contributions from others.
And it does not store your files in a way that is self-contained. And there is no option to control the naming or organization of the files it stores.
Your file system should be navigatable and understandable without having to run software and pull information from a database in order to interpret it. Tube Archivist is far FAR from ideal media archival software IMHO.
It misses the mark in so many ways it drives me insane.