cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 19 hours agoInterfaceimagemessage-square18linkfedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down16
arrow-up1137arrow-down1imageInterfacecm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 19 hours agomessage-square18linkfedilink
minus-squaregargolito@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up25·19 hours agoThis seems like a recursion nightmare for overthinkers like me.
minus-squareKhanzarate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·18 hours agoLuckily my model of other people’s model of me has lost enough genuine character that it’s more of a trope so my model of someone else’s model of me has like 3 models that apply to everyone and that’s so reductive I ignore them.
minus-squareMudMan@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4·17 hours agoOh, stay away from semioticians, then. Semiosis diagrams are like trypophobia bait memes but specifically for information scientists.
minus-squareSergio@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·16 hours agoI vaguely remember from grad school that “copresence heuristics” were a workable solution, but I don’t remember the details.
minus-squareBubs@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·16 hours agoBasically, the big circle is what you think of them, and the small circle is what you believe they think of you.
This seems like a recursion nightmare for overthinkers like me.
Luckily my model of other people’s model of me has lost enough genuine character that it’s more of a trope so my model of someone else’s model of me has like 3 models that apply to everyone and that’s so reductive I ignore them.
Oh, stay away from semioticians, then.
Semiosis diagrams are like trypophobia bait memes but specifically for information scientists.
I vaguely remember from grad school that “copresence heuristics” were a workable solution, but I don’t remember the details.
Basically, the big circle is what you think of them, and the small circle is what you believe they think of you.