That one is easy, any circle jerk that is also funny will do it.
You seem to have a contradiction there.
Seeing your shitty meme reposted in another community
Accurate sysadmin look
Lemmy Instance Admins when their instance unexpectedly crashes and goes offline for more than four hours
Which type of person is Jack next to the door in the water freezing to death?
Probably a Nicole DM victim.
Or a Lemmy developer.
Not using Lemmy
I comment here more than I did back on Reddit.
It’s just the name I think doesn’t catch general users… sorry, unpopular opinion maybe!
Remeber if you’re a mod or admin to make a vague rule that you can use for whenever you feel like banning someone but they didn’t break the rules!
deleted by creator
I know you’re joking but I honestly think vague rules are sometimes better, as long as they aren’t abused like you say here. Overly specific rules have a tendency to lead to people looking for loopholes or being so long that people don’t read them.
Vague rules are power. Power corrupts. No anarchist should be creating vague rules. If they do, all other anarchists have the right to kick their shins
deleted by creator
There’s a problem with specific rules in that a malicious actor can intentionally work to be a dick without breaking any of the exact rules. Which is why Don’t Be A Dick is a reasonable rule.
Vague rules aren’t more powerful than specific ones - any admin can just change their rules if they want or ban people anyway. You could have super specific rules and power abuse simultaneously easily.
I’m also not an anarchist anyway.
Vague rules hide and legitimise abuse of power.
