• snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 days ago

    That’s your favorite distro of linux now, but what previous operating system do you come from?

    • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      5 days ago

      What if he’s a Gentoo user? He’ll mock me for using Archlinux, I’ve got to play this hand carefully so as to not blow my cover. There’s always the chance he’s a Mint user and I have nothing to worry about, but then, he could be one of those users that says ricing is a waste of time, who uses his OS professionally, but then, he might be a Fedora user… how do I approach this issue without seeming like a pleb?! Based Stallman, help me!

      NixOS

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        That was not my experience with 2000. Either 98 or XP (post-SP2) were more solider, from memory.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I think you might be confusing Windows ME with 2000.

          Windows 2000 was built on the Windows NT kernel which was business focused so absolutely rock solid.

          Windows 98 was a good jump in stability from the 95 kernel bit still very prone to crashing.

          I agree XP was good but it was the successor to 2K so built on it and I moved to Linux as soon as the 2K directx support would have forced me to move to XP which wasn’t as lightweight.

          For clarity there were two development branches within Microsoft at the turn of the millennium: one that was based off windows 3.1 (and became 95, 98 and ME) and one that was based off windows NT 3.1 which was solid as fuck and eventually became 2000 then XP.

          Edit: Here’s a decent graphic: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Microsoft_Windows_versions#/media/File:Windows_Version_History.svg

          • Dave@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Oh shit, I think you’re right!

            Now that a stretch my memory back decades, I seem to recall I never extensively used 2000, it was ME.

            I agree XP was good

            I seem to recall something about XP not being good at the start, and it wasn’t until about SP2 that it reached it’s famed quality. But now I can’t seem to find anything about it.

            • khannie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Ah the naming was terrible in fairness… Windows millennium edition and windows 2000. I mean c’mon like. Haha.

              And yeah I was gone by SP2 but I remember my gaming friends holding tight to that for as long as they could. There were even various really lightweight editions of SP2 that you could download if you had the balls to install a hacked together operating system from some randomer on the internet. And they all did.

              Different times!!

              Edit: also what’s up Dave on the far side of the world!

              • Dave@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Edit: also what’s up Dave on the far side of the world!

                I’m actually on the close side of the world 🤯