The New York Times published a seven-day series of editorials (12/8/25–12/14/25) meant to examine, as the initial piece put it, “what’s gone wrong with the US military” and “how we can create a relevant and effective force that can deter wars whenever possible and win them wherever necessary.”
These editorials serve as little more than propagandistic, jingoistic and Sinophobic tools that treat war as a game, turning a blind eye to the very real harms that wars have on civilians.
Devoting seven editorials to boosting the US military when the country’s own democracy is under threat—and Trump is using the military so irresponsibly and illegally that high-level officers are resigning—the Times demonstrated that its commitment to militarism knows few bounds.
…
This is written very pro-China, making it no better than the NYT trash.
They give themselves away whenever they label criticism as Sinophobic without evidence.
At that point, I wouldn’t even use the NYT to wipe my ass
Anti-war and most peace-oriented president starting American Civil War 2. Classic.
NYT’s reputation has crashed pretty hard.
The US military IS the resources. What even.




