Using a system that is known for making mistakes to write safety regulations for an area known to require particularly highly specialized knowledge and obsessive attention to detail?
What could possibly go wrong?
“We don’t need the perfect rule on XYZ. We don’t even need a very good rule on XYZ,” DoT general counsel Gregory Zerzan said, according to the recent meeting notes obtained by ProPublica. “We want good enough,” he said. “We’re flooding the zone.”
Holy ineptitude, Batman! I hope he’s talking about just making drafts which will then be edited by human experts, but the article is not clear on that.
I hope he’s talking about just making drafts which will then be edited by human experts
didn’t you get the memo? “expertise” is a bad thing now. only unfailing loyalty and blind obedience matter to the fascist regime. and if people die because of AI safety regs? blame it on mexicans, african americans, gays, women, liberals, etc.–it’s always worked for them in the past, and it will keep working, until every single fascist is removed from anything resembling a position of authority
Does anyone want to bet me that this is a terrible idea?
Using a system that is known for making mistakes to write safety regulations for an area known to require particularly highly specialized knowledge and obsessive attention to detail?
What could possibly go wrong?
Holy ineptitude, Batman! I hope he’s talking about just making drafts which will then be edited by human experts, but the article is not clear on that.
didn’t you get the memo? “expertise” is a bad thing now. only unfailing loyalty and blind obedience matter to the fascist regime. and if people die because of AI safety regs? blame it on mexicans, african americans, gays, women, liberals, etc.–it’s always worked for them in the past, and it will keep working, until every single fascist is removed from anything resembling a position of authority