• Hazor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Using a system that is known for making mistakes to write safety regulations for an area known to require particularly highly specialized knowledge and obsessive attention to detail?

      What could possibly go wrong?

      “We don’t need the perfect rule on XYZ. We don’t even need a very good rule on XYZ,” DoT general counsel Gregory Zerzan said, according to the recent meeting notes obtained by ProPublica. “We want good enough,” he said. “We’re flooding the zone.”

      Holy ineptitude, Batman! I hope he’s talking about just making drafts which will then be edited by human experts, but the article is not clear on that.

      • U7826391786239@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I hope he’s talking about just making drafts which will then be edited by human experts

        didn’t you get the memo? “expertise” is a bad thing now. only unfailing loyalty and blind obedience matter to the fascist regime. and if people die because of AI safety regs? blame it on mexicans, african americans, gays, women, liberals, etc.–it’s always worked for them in the past, and it will keep working, until every single fascist is removed from anything resembling a position of authority

  • U7826391786239@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    it’s insane that the list of reasons i’ll never fly again keeps getting longer and longer, and in ways that i would have never guessed

  • Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Cartoon villians”…

    Seen that term used, before…

    it’s appropriate, here.


    Seriously, couldn’t crowdsourcing commentary on regs find the bugs in drafts better?

    Not necessarily quicker, but better?

    Because there’s actual-experience & actual-thinking going-on?

    UnFSCKing believable…

    I’d be outlawing AI-written regs, not enforcing it…

    AI as bug-detector, linter, editor-comments, certainly, but … no: you use issue-diagrams for carefully-engineering your regs, you don’t let “hallucinations” encode your regs, so you feel more “accomplished”.

    Idiocy.

    _ /\ _

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    The AI techbros convinced a bunch of incompetent, fascist idiots that LLMs would enable them to run the government.