• ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Optimizing for things people love” aka talking to you like an hr team building seminar

    It’s frustrating, or maybe it’s a good thing given the tendency for some people to form weird pseudo social relationships with LLMs, to see the evolution of chatgpts language processing

    Public chatgpt only had the 3.5, 4, and 4o model but you can play with earlier models like 2 and 3 on huggingface. These were far weirder, often robotic and stilted but sometimes mirroring more natural colloquial English more based on the input

    Rather than make something that is authentic and more natural to interact with they instead go for the ultra sanitized HR corporate speak bullshit. Completely bland and inoffensive with constant encouragement and reinforcement to drive engagement that feels so inauthentic (unless you are desperate for connection with anything, I guess). It’s mirrored in other models to some degree, deepseek, llama, etc (I don’t know about grok, fuck going on twitter).

    3-5 years until it’s ruined by advertising, tops. If that

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      i don’t understand how people can find it appealing when computers speak like humans, i genuinely find HAL-9000 more appealing.

      the ideal computer response style is how it works in star trek voyager