• frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 hours ago

    As “the other side” don’t speak for me. I want guillotines and a substantial redistribution of wealth until we no longer have billionaires.

  • rossman@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    i felt embarassed trying to be a centrist at one point because i figured i should move where their goal posts were. they’re trying to normalize shifting goalposts and they know it. unfortunately there’s no actual social punishment for this.

  • Iusedtobeanalien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Obviously the republicans are genuinely terrible people

    But I’ll give you an equivalence that actually holds up

    Both parties have their snouts in the trough and depend on huge levels of external funding which completely undermines your democracy

    That is a problem that needs to be fixed

    • Wataba@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      OK, fix it when the government isn’t on a bloodhunt for transgender people, to start with.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    21 hours ago

    A lot of world class dipshits on this very platform think both sides are equal. Getting pretty tired of reading

    “Both sides are fascist, one’s just more open about it.”

    Stupidest fucking sentiment I’ve ever had the displeasure of reading. Absolute lack of education and critical thinking skills to say shit like that.

    • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The lack of critical thinking skills is when people cannot understand that one side is fascist and the other enables the fascists.

      To many leftist, capitalist imperialism is just fascism in disguise, and they are entirely correct.

    • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      I don’t think they’re both equal, they’re certainly both shit.

      How do you measure the quality of shit?

      Let’s just say I wouldn’t let Maxine Waters or Mitch McConnell watch my dog

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        If “shittiness” was a binary, they’d definitely the same. However, in the real world it’s a spectrum that looks more like:

        • theparadox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          With their proposed ideas, I’d mostly agree.

          However, with the increasingly shittier Republicans they have compromised further and further into utter shit. They’ve tacked toward shitty, pretty hard in some cases, to try to lure some shitty votes their way… alienating those who want less shit. They’ve opted to take money from extremely shitty people because they have a lot of money but those people desire there to be more shit. The Democrats abandoned their less shitty ground repeatedly even when they managed to find some real leverage, unleashing torrents of shit for no apparent reason (unless they actually want more shit).

          So yes, their campaign websites have a lot less shit on them than the Republicans, but in practice the party as a whole has either pushed for things to be much shittier or compromised their alleged ideals unnecessarily resulting in things being much shittier.

          There are certainly diamonds in the shit. I don’t think it’s all of them, but current leadership is definitely way more shitty than they look. What concerns me is that every time we get rid of some small contingency of Democrats that are obviously bathing in shit and willing to open the floodgates for the Republicans, we always seem to find just enough of the remaining Democrats wiling to dive in and replace them. It gives the impression that, for a significant subset of them, their campaign slogans and alleged ideals are performative.

  • danhab99@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Which side is telling us that these are the sides. I’m not disagreeing with either of the sides but I kind of feel like there’s chirality to every political opinion.

  • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The media is just a billionaire propaganda machine. They have to make both sides sound equally right so both sides keep fighting each other instead of fighting the billionaires causing all the problems.

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Real, lasting change isn’t going to happen instantly and with a minimal of effort.

    Movements have to be built, leaders have to be cultivated. These things take time. Mistakes will be made. There will be times when you do everything right but still there are setbacks. If you want your working-class peers to represent your ideals in government, you have to support them. You have to be willing to let them learn, you have to help them out financially and strategically. Because otherwise, the vast majority of them can’t compete against billionaires and their favored picks.

    Voting alone is not enough in today’s climate. Angrily typing at each other and posting furious videos blaming everybody but ourselves is not enough. You continue to do the same but expect different results – you’re going to be disappointed.

    Buh, buh, buh, buh, buh MY candidate didn’t win their primary. Guess what? You’ve got at least 2 more years to build a movement around people who reflect your values and represent you. You can’t snap your fingers and expect the world to revolve around you instantly. Winning takes time, planning, strategy, organizing, money, and so much more. There is no quick fix strategy, and I guarantee you that even if literally every single thing from this moment forward goes exactly right and exactly your way, it’s still going to be the better part of a decade (or longer) before there’s any chance of arriving where you want to be. This isn’t a sprint. It’s not even a marathon. Making progress means you have to keep going.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      The discouraging part isn’t that it’s going to take a long time.

      The discouraging part is that people need to be convinced that they should treat others like human beings.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    The democrats had the house, senate, and presidency for 4+ years. Where is that Healthcare?

    Spoiler: Both sides are bad, they both get paid off. Its just that one side is really fucking honest with you right now … to the point where they commit crimes in public because no one will do anything about it.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The democrats had the house, senate, and presidency for 4+ years

      What years where these pray tell? I guess if you don’t mean “4+ consecutive years” but that would be silly wouldn’t it?

      Also, why did you fail to mention the Supreme Court? Interesting.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      ROFLOL yeah it’s the Democrats fault we don’t have national healthcare. tHeY hAd foUR YeaRS WherE is It?? Smeared all over the soles of the Republicans shoes. That’s where it is.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      They’re not the other side that this post is talking about.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Both sides are bad

      Cool observation. Here’s a smiley face sticker and a lollipop.

      Here’s another observation.

      Both sides are NOT the same.

      So, in a system where you WILL get one or the other for the foreseeable future, what would you consider to be the intelligent thing to do?

      Also, you are wrong. Democrats haven’t held a trifecta for 4+ years since the 1960s. In recent memory their control has only lasted 2-3 years at a time, and you’ve also failed to take into account that many things require a supermajority in Congress to enact and Dem’s total control has typically been by a very thin margin.


      Key Periods of Unified Democratic Control (White House + Senate + House):

      2021–2023 (117th Congress): President Joe Biden, with narrow House and Senate majorities.

      2009–2011 (111th Congress): President Barack Obama, passing the Affordable Care Act.

      1993–1995 (103rd Congress): President Bill Clinton’s first two years.

      1961–1969 (87th–90th Congresses): Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson.

      1933–1947 (73rd–79th Congresses): President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the start of Truman’s term.


      Where is that Healthcare?

      When I was young and broke Obama, during one of those windows of control, gave me affordable healthcare when I had none and he had to fight tooth and nail with Republicans to get it.

      You really need to do your homework before you post things on the internet that other people who don’t do their homework will just accept as fact. It really doesn’t help our situation.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The healthcare bill written by Republican Mitt Romney that didn’t have universal healthcare and ended up being a handout to health insurance companies? That bill?

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Were you not following the back and forth fight that went on back then for him to try to get anything through? Yeah it’s shit but it’s a lot better than the nothing there was. It was progress and if this country had actual adults in it instead of a bunch of emotional children and corrupt politicians then things could continue to progress.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            corrupt politicians

            Like the dems.

            if this country had actual adults in it instead of a bunch of emotional children

            Blaming the voters. The endpoint of every democratic argument.

            • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              20 hours ago

              Like the dems.

              Yeah, cuz both sides are equally corrupt.

              Two questions.

              1. Are you aware that reality is all sorts of imperfect and there will ALWAYS be corruption in political parties?

              2. Are you aware that for the foreseeable future, and most likely for the remainder of your life, you will have Dems or Repubs in control?

              So with those in mind, what good do you think it does to whine about a party having corruption when all parties will always have corruption and it’s our duty to make the best decision within that reality? Such as making sure the WAY, WAY, WAY less corrupt party is in control and not the WAY, WAY, WAY more corrupt party.

              Blaming the voters.

              Why wouldn’t they be to blame? How do you think the president and members of Congress got there? We live in a nation that willingly elected a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who ran a fraudulent university and charity and already had one massively failed presidency under his belt. Not to mention the open bigotry and obviously low IQ.

              This IS a country full of child-like adults, and our government is a testament to that. Of course voters are to blame. We made this happen.

            • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Voters and non voters alike are ultimately responsible for the political makeup of the country, yeah.

              • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                20 hours ago

                I like how you make the most basic truthful statement possible and people still downvote you.

                Not a great sign for the future.

          • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            20 hours ago

            The person you are responding to was probably still breast feeding during Obama’s presidency. So they’re likely completely unaware that before Obamacare millions of people just didn’t have healthcare and that Obama had to fight like hell with Republicans just to get it done.

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You are responding to someone who doesn’t do his homework and who is being upvoted by other people who do not do their homework.

        • Wilco@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          You literally said dems havent had the House, Senate, and presidency … then posted the Biden era where he had the house, senate, and pres. You are acting and posting like AI.

      • Wilco@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Dont argue with me. Go argue with history …

        117th Congress (2021–2023): Democrats gained control of the Senate (via Georgia runoffs) and held the House, paired with President Biden’s election. The 4-Year Period: This 4-year stretch saw shifting majorities in the Senate, but the Democratic caucus maintained a working majority to control the legislative agenda from 2021-2023, while holding the House from 2019-2023, marking a four-year tenure of overall legislative

        • Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          You said they had the house, senate, AND presidency for 4+ years. The house yes, presidency yes, senate no. Nothing becomes law without the senate. Your claim was not accurate.

          • Wilco@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Argue with Google. Not me. Biden had the house and senate.

            You sound like AI.

            • zd9@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Do you remember Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema? Remember how they kind of held up everything?

              • Wilco@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Why weren’t they censured? Everything plays out EXACTLY like big business wants it. If you dont understand that corporations have nearly ful control of politics then we have nothing to discuss. Here is the summary … both sides bow down to billionaires and corporations.

                • zd9@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  Sure rotating villain and all that. Yes generally both sides serve their corporate rulers, but the progressives still caucus with Democrats, so they’re slightly better and should always be voted for if the alternative is literal fascists. FPTP is the main problem in the electoral process.

  • xta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    the “media” doesn’t “think” they all just push their current agenda

    • zbyte64@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Blaming voters is just another way of wishing reality was different. Lots of people are telling you exactly how they are going to act but you are asking those without power to accommodate those with power. That’s a choice and it says a lot about how you perceive power and it’s authority.

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      People refusing to vote for the lesser of two evils is what got us the worse evil!

      What are you even talking about? Biden got elected and enabled the modern-day holocaust lol. There is no “lesser evil”, there are many heads to the same hydra: capitalism.

      • Soulg@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        Uhh yeah Biden bad but things would be less bad if Harris had won, doesn’t make her good, what point are you trying to make

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          19 hours ago

          Less bad for you, maybe. Ask the people murdered by the Genocide Joe - Holocaust Harris administration if things would’ve been better for them. Ask the survivors if Harris being elected will bring back their dead family.

          The point I’m trying to make is that you are unconsciously a white supremacist (yes, even if you are not white) who is willing to sign your name off to endorse the ethnic-based mass-murder of brown people overseas in order to protect your own privilege and comfort. That’s “lesser evil”. Try fighting all evil instead.

          Aside from all that, Harris promised the “most lethal” military in the world - that means one thing, “killing the most people” - so on top of addressing your weak, white supremacist premise, I’m going to have to disagree with your weak liberal conclusion as well.

          • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Thank you for having critical thinking skills and the patience to actually type it out for people who most likely won’t even bother to read it in good faith.

            • 7101334@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              11 hours ago

              lol yeah I used to do audio transcription so I have like a ~100 WPM typing rate… I can waste some internet words

              • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I have neuropathy that has affected my fingers, my PC is set up on a coffee table in a corner cause that’s the only space I have for it, and I usually only browse through Boost on my phone anyways. So, typing things out is a pain and I usually just point to authors and books to read.

      • 𝕲𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍🔻𝕯𝖃 (he/him)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        well fuck me for prioritizing the genocides happening in my own country over the genocides happening on the other side of the planet.

        edit: responded to the wrong comment, but the one I meant to respond to was also by you so I’m leaving it.

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          What’s happening in America is terrible but if you’re comparing it to what is happening in Palestine as being even close to equivalent, you are a chronically out-of-touch and overprivileged liberal.

  • ClownStatue@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Actually, the other side mostly wants things to stay the same. Their constituents, on the other hand, would like to see better healthcare, education, unions, and stronger safety nets. But since the other side aren’t fascists, their voters are stuck with them.

    • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      This right here ☝️. The grassroots democrats I could support. It’s the Chuck Schumers and John Fettermans that will undermine the party from within that make supporting democrats difficult.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        There’s always a rotating villain.

        Used to be Dianne Feinstein. Then it was Joe Manchin. Then it was that Sinema bitch. Now it’s Fetterman and Schumer.

        And people just kind of ignore the pattern and pretend it isn’t a party-wide PR strategy.

        • ClownStatue@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Not speaking for anyone else, but I’m fully aware of what the Democratic Party stands for. Problem is, the alternative has gotten so much worse.

          Before the current madness, there was a part of me aching to vote for someone crazy to come and hasten the act of burning this mess to the ground. Then I saw it, and got scared. Maybe that’s when I should’ve leaned in.

        • Corn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Rotating villain. He allows them to tell their constituents “we want what you want, we just don’t have the power because of thay one guy, but if you vote just a little harder, we won’t pull the football away this time”, while telling their donors “we ain’t giving them shit lmao”.

          • flamingleg@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            17 hours ago

            remember that one time the villain was ‘the parliamentarian’? apparently that guy exists and is suddenly important when the democrats run out of reasons to blame republicans

        • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          He was elected in 2022, so his next election is in 2028.

          Senators are elected for 6 years. House Representatives have election every 2 years.

          Edit: gotta love the down vote, as if facts didn’t matter, just feelings or as if I wrote the Constitution.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Exactly.

          Look at how Donald has dealt with people who get out of line. Democrats aren’t powerless. The villain’s part of their party strategy.

        • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          How would that work, exactly?

          PA senators are not subject to recalls, so it’s out of the hands of the voters. He could technically be impeached and removed from office by the Senate itself… but for what, exactly? It’s not illegal to vote a certain way, even if it’s against the wishes of your constituency.

          And even if Fetterman were somehow removed, PA is an extremely competitive state. Remember, he won against Doctor fucking Oz, so the chance of someone even worse coming in to replace him is quite high. The devil you know, etc etc…

          Best case scenario is that he gets primaried into irrelevance in 2028 by someone with actual integrity. But even then, I’m not holding my breath…

          • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            How would that work, exactly?

            You pull all of his committee assignments and neuter his value to lobbyists. If all he has is his vote on the legislation that hits the floor, he can’t do much and it will hurt him both financially and politically, because if you don’t have value to lobbyists they won’t send you “gifts”.

            You attack him personally and threaten his business or personal connections. For example, if Dems wanted to pull Manchin in line, for example, they could have sent the DoJ after his daughter for price gouging consumers on pharmaceuticals.

            And yes, while it doesn’t matter now, you make sure he knows he’ll be primaried out and smeared like yesterday’s dog shit. Character assassination is effective and could bring someone in line, especially when they’re enthusiastically supporting genocide and Israel’s popularity is in the shitter.

            That’s how.

            They’ve never been powerless. They’re just complicit.

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Because he was elected and is still serving his term?

          And it doesn’t appear that he’s the type of person to resign.

          Do the 21 people who have upvoted you thus far not understand how our government works?

      • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Then primary them.

        The odds of us getting out of this with a revolution are vanishingly small.

        The answer is going to be reforming the Democrat party by primarying the Schumers and the Fettermans out.

        Party reformation has happened multiple times in American history and conservatives literally just did it in the worst way possible to the Republican party over the last decade or two.

        Party reformation takes time. That is life.

        • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Right, but in the mean time it makes any attempt to claim “The Democrats stand for [insert policy position]” a lie, because while an individual democrat may believe in those things, the part as a whole can’t agree on anything at all. They can’t even align themselves on their own platform, let alone apply pressure to the Republicans. At best they’re nothing but a speed break for more republican policy. You’re still getting republican policy, just slower, and they can’t move the needle in the other direction even if they win because they’ll simply surrender in advance.

          Wasting more time and more money trying to slow the rate the US collapses into a burning train wreck is an exercise in futility. The only real solution is to try and build a “coalition of the willing” to preserve what is left and the Republicans drive the rest, screaming incoherently, off the cliff they’re headed for. Small scale organizing, networks to help move people to safety “underground railroad” style, to move material and finances in ways that circumvent federal control, create safe-havens that can resist federal encroachment and operate outside of federal regulation meant to break down resistance. Register some “Churches” that can provide physical plant and meeting grounds, as well as offer support services when federal support is ripped up. Build a nation within a nation.

          Voting for Democrats isn’t going to stop this spiral. They have no vision, no will, no unity, and zero political capital to actually create change. Sure, vote blue to slow the bleeding, if you’re still allowed by next election, but as long as they’re a party so big tent they have no direction at all, they’re just a slower, more painful collapse.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Correction: They SAY they want health care and education, get elected, and then spend their political capital making most people poorer, doing fascism, and genociding.