You can also buy it as a DIY kit, or simply reference the components list and instructions, and use the firmware, drivers, and software shared.

  • Gloomy@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    To my understanding this needs LaserGRBL as Software. It seems this is Window software only. Kind of a wired choice for an Open Source project.

      • pankuleczkapl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        You should also consider the fact that Linux users are hugely overrepresented in such communities, because there is a large overlap between people who, as a hobby, want to make stuff in the physical world and people who want to make stuff in the digital world.

        • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          2 days ago

          You’re right, there are more Linux users in such communities. How foolish of them to only cater to 95% of the population!

          • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Catering to 95% of the population is one thing, but a DIY lasrer engraver doesn’t cater to a very large market share of Window’s users. I’d guess this might cater to maybe 3-5% of windows users and that’s being generous as hell. On the Linux side this caters to quite a few users as they tend to want to make and support open source. Just my two cents though, have a wonderful day on purpose!

          • rbn@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 day ago

            Based on my experience Linux and Mac OS are more or less on par with Windows in the maker community with Windows’ popularity rather decreasing than increasing.

          • oatscoop@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah! Why design a product that caters to your target demographic instead of designing it for people that won’t use it?

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Well they probably designed the product for themselves, not anyone else, because that’s usually how open source works. No one goes and writes open source that they aren’t going to be able to use, that would be idiotic.

      • Willoughby@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I see some of us don’t bother mixing the kool aid and just snort the crystals off the kitchen counter.

        most of the population doesn’t even own a computer, much less the aptitude or will to build a DIY laser engraver

        • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It sounds like you just described all of the people that are not the target market, as opposed to PC users… that would use pcs, with software to drive a laser.

          My first job out of University was for a CNC laser and turret company and you’d better believe 100% of their control systems ran on Windows.

          But I suppose I can agree with you that it would be very hard to operate one of these without a computer?

          • Willoughby@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Oh, extremely!

            The cad plotting software I’ve used for laser engravers was Windows-based, but I didn’t consider myself any sort of user of any OS to sit in a chair and burn logos into hearing aids.

            I wouldn’t think any major company would be DIY-ing anything, and be more likely to purchase it readymade. The US taxpayer pays for the writeoff anyway.

            IMO, for hobbyists, for tinkerers, for DIYers, make it run on anything. There’s no reason not to.

            • cardfire@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I would certainly expect linux ports to get off the ground, and I don’t see any reason it would be confined to Windows land. It just seemed disingenuous for folks to be getting mad at the guy to point out that the software being written for Windows first is targeting the largest possible audience.

      • Anivia@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Windows has less than 80% market share. Not because of Linux, but because MacOS rapidly gained market share since Apple released the M1

    • zout@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      Since it’s open source, you could just port it to other software which runs on an iMac, maybe with some help of AI.

        • zout@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          :-p I was going to type Amiga, but changed my mind in the last second. I think complaining this is Windows only on a hardware community isn’t really necessary. Also, the hardware is open source so you can probably adapt it to work with any system on lots of hardware. That requires some work, but most open source projects do.

      • sparkee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m with you. It is an open source project and the author is under no obligation to develop it for your preferences.

  • aeiou@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a cute project, but hardly seems practical with the availabilty of Chinese laser engravers that have 5-10x the laser power for only $30-60 more.

    • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any particular ones you would recommend? I’m not super familiar with this technology tbh

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I dont have a product recommendation but I do have a safety recommendation, and that is research about laser safety before buying anything. There are cheap laser engravers out there without proper safety shielding that can and will blind you. As long as you have good laser safety glasses it’s fine but the ones that they ship with the product are often not actually rated for the power levels or wavelengths that the laser has.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most of them are going to use the laser diode out of a Blu-Ray, set in a heat sink that’ll let them at least try to run the thing at about a watt.

      This will let them kind of mar the finish on some wood I guess. Compare this to a CO2 laser that start at about 30 watts that can punch right through plywood and acrylic and diode lasers are just 1. uselessly pathetic and 2. will blind your ass in the ugliest way possible.

      You see, something like a CO2 laser is far-infrared, the tube itself glows a nice purplish pink but the laser light is invisible to the human eye; even if your rods or cones reacted to it, which they don’t, your cornea is opaque to it. You get shot in the eye with a CO2 laser, you’re going to get burned on the cornea. Which, thanks to motorcyclists, might be an injury a surgeon can fix, if your entire eye doesn’t just pop like a superheated zit.

      Diode engravers use blue light. As in, in the visible spectrum. Pretty close to the wavelength your blue cones respond to, actually. Since your eyes are designed to use that wavelength of light, your corneas are transparent to that wavelength. So if you get hit in the eye with a blue laser, you just get a third degree burn right on your retina. None of the sciences or religions can fix that; there’s just going to be a blind streak in your vision from now on.

      Wear your goddamn safety glasses while working around class IV laser devices.