A typically German solution for the underlying problem. It doesn’t solve the problem at all, but introduces a shitload of bureaucracy that’s about as useful as an ulcer on the arse instead.
The headline would have been correct on 22th December 2025, when it was introduced.
Now it has already been introduced and the 3 month period is over. Since it’s April, all expats have failed to apply for a permission. That includes all men, there is no 45 year limit for the permission requirement.
I am curious how many Germans will be worried that this topic wasn’t discussed when the law was changed and how many wonder that nobody reminded them at the start of the year. The handling is suspiciously sneaky.
Since it’s April, all expats have failed to apply for a permission.
This is incorrect from what I can tell, the law provides an exception for people who have already reported the abandonment of their permanent residence in Germany (which was already required by another law, Bundesmeldegesetz § 17 (2)).
You could be right: People who don’t live in Germany don’t have the defence duty.
Die Wehrpflicht ruht, solange Wehrpflichtige ihren ständigen Aufenthalt und ihre Lebensgrundlage außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben,
However, the law states that men, not people with duty, have to ask for permission.
Männliche Personen haben nach Vollendung des 17. Lebensjahres eine Genehmigung des zuständigen Karrierecenters der Bundeswehr einzuholen
One person argued that a headline clarified that it is for people with duties. It’s possible but I am not sure.
Yeah the law is indeed quite complex, with a lot of caveats and cross-references. One important bit is the continuation of your second quote:
wenn sie die Bundesrepublik Deutschland länger als drei Monate verlassen wollen, ohne dass die Voraussetzungen des § 1 Absatz 2 bereits vorliegen.
And §1 (2) says:
(2) Die Wehrpflicht ruht, solange Wehrpflichtige ihren ständigen Aufenthalt und ihre Lebensgrundlage außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben, wenn Tatsachen die Annahme rechtfertigen, dass sie beabsichtigen, ihren ständigen Aufenthalt im Ausland beizubehalten.
If you have already lived outside of Germany more than three months than that is a “fact that justifies the assumption” that you will continue to do so.
One person argued that a headline clarified that it is for people with duties. It’s possible but I am not sure.
If by duties you mean being under “Wehrpflicht”, that’s just any male 17-45 (during peace) that hasn’t been exempted. If you mean “Wehrdienst”, then no, the paragraph is explicitly about Wehrpflicht. This is intended to keep track of anybody that could be recruited in case of war.
It really is sneaky. I wonder If it was intentional, or if media coverage was simply overshadowed by everything else currently going on. Either way, I somewhat disagree.
It does sound less problematic if you cite some “good” sources like this one: https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/neuerung-seit-1-januar-bundeswehr-maenner-bis-45-muessen-auslandsaufenthalt-melden/100214453.html
So basically it is not sanctioned (yet) if you don’t do it and it is automatically granted as long as we are not in an active “war situation” (whatever that exactly means) or rather as long as our military service is still voluntary.
It sounds very problematic in any case, even if they promise (pinky swear) that it is granted automatically.
What kind of shit is that? Wasn’t even necessary in the old conscription system.
The active war situation has to be declared by the German government.
Declaring it changes a few aspects of how our government works, and how much it can limit individual rights.
The precursor to it is a declaration of a “state of tension”.
Neither has ever happened in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany, not even when Soviet tanks played a game of chicken with the Americans in Berlin.This wording comes from Russian propaganda network, to plant panic and disagreement as instructed.
I thought Germany was a progressive country. Why only men?
I don’t give a shit. My daughter isn’t going to serve this pos country. I’d rather piss off than risk anything for this garbage country full of Nazi cunts.
Are we? In any case, it’s a law from the 60s. They “only” modified a paragraph to make it apply in peace time.
But yeah, if we must have conscription laws again, they should definitely apply to all genders.
I believe the specific law is from 1977, but I agree with your point in general, that service shouldn’t discriminate based on gender.
From my knowledge this rule was supposedly active for decades before Germany discontinued conscription and nobody really followed it then. Why there is a need to reactivate a law that will not be followed by the vast majority and that has no enforcement mechanisms associated with it really beats me. It’s probably a mix of incompetence and “we’ve always been doing things like this”.
Sweden reactivated our conscription duty in 2017 and then, since the law should be gender neutral, women were then also required to muster and serve if they where deemed needed by the armed forces.
For those looking in horror at Sweden for forcing young men and women into the military: In reality if you really don’t want to serve, then you will probably preform a lot worse than a person highly motivated to serve their country. Thus you will not be called upon by the armed forces to do conscription.
However with the troubling times we are in the Swedish armed forces require a lot more people to uphold the deterrence and that results in the bar for who gets called upon gets lowered.
I thought Germany was a progressive country.
Oh, sweet summer child…
Outright nazis, a supposed center-right (and highly corrupt) party copying every nazi talking point and a supposed center-left (and not caring about anything but gifts for pensioneers) party agreeing to every insanity as long as they get a position in government, too, combine to an easy 2/3 majority in polls (did I mention age bracket 55+ having a majority in elections?^^), which translates into an even bigger majority in seats.
We have stopped doing actual politics at all as it’s completely drowned out by culture war 24/7.
They are so “progressive” that they advocate for burning more fossil fuels right now as renewables are obviosuly not working, Germany is -unlike the Nordics- much too cold for heat pumps, and also much too big for electric mobility with its limited range as everyone is obviously driving a few thousand kilometers daily…
No, that’s barely more than a slight exaggeration of their regular talking points.
The progressive parties in Germany don’t want conscription for all genders.
They want conscription for no one.
Also, Germany’s government is lead by this guy right now.It’s also a problem with our Grundgesetz/ constitution. It has the old law in it, which only requires men to serve. To change this, it would require a two-third majority in the parlament, i.e. the government would need to help of the opposition. Also the current ruling government party is conservative and isnt really interested in changing it anyways.
Worth noting here that this article of the constitution already had to be changed once because the European human rights court ruled that treating men and women differently isn’t allowed. The case wasn’t about the stipulation that only men need to serve but about one explicitly preventing women from doing so, and thus Article 12a (1) remained intact; But it stands to reason that it would be struck down if somebody brings the case before the courts, especially since there is precedent now.
Removed by mod
I’d not call it green-washing, but realistic politics focussed on finding possible majorities through compromises, without insisting on maximum demands, ideologically speaking. This is often interpreted as “greens doing conservative politics”. In reality, they are doing the right thing. Just at a slower and less radical rate than some (like me) would like. I accept that. Due to the nature of the system, some progress needs to happen slowly in order to not disrupt it.
If disruption is your goal however, than yeah, the German Green Party is really bad at that.
Removed by mod
I am surely willing to argue with you, if you are able to stick to facts instead of emotionally perceived truths.
The Traffic Light coalition had to balance Germany’s pro-Israel stance with growing criticism of Israel’s conduct in Gaza. After an initial phase of strong support (due to Germanys so called “Staatsräson”), the coalition became more critical, slashed arms exports in 2024 compared with 2023, and provided major humanitarian aid to Gaza. Saying they “cheered for genocide” is polemical and mislead. Maybe you should reconsider your news sources.
Also, nuclear power is not a viable path for Germany. New plants are too expensive, take too long to build, and offer hardly any practical advantage over faster expansion of renewables, grids, and storage. The Greens acted accordingly. You COULD criticize the ban of nuclear power in the first place - but that was the doing of the CDU/SPD, not the Greens.
I somewhat agree with you regarding taxation. They could have done more. But then again: they were in a coalition with two parties, that are ideologically very different. It’s far from precise to measure a partys moral by the actions of a coalition in which they were a junior-partner. Stop dealing in absolutes.
Removed by mod
I have no interest in continuing a discussion on that basis, so I am leaving it here.
Removed by mod
Annanela Baerbock literally said it is fine to murder Palestinian children
Then, I’d like to see a source for her literally saying thid.
She […] cheered for genocide.
For this too, please.
Removed by mod
Idk why you’re getting downvoted, you speak the truth
Alot of politics in Germany revolves around cult like following instead of critical thinking, hence calling greens as green washing would get one down voted. The fact is Green politicians pushed to shut down nuclear energy. They also cheered for genocide, in fact they are complicit in the genocide. And instead of throwing away Annalena Baerbock, she got promoted to UNGA for supporting a genocide. Same reason why half of the holocaust victims are ignored and the remembrance is only limited specific identities. Roma and Sinti für example had to struggle until recently to get their genocide recognised and the first holocaust in Namibia was not recognised until few years ago. Meanwhile 80 billion Euros were sent to the apartheid state in Middle East to oppress people.
Section 3 of the Compulsory Military Service Act (Wehrpflichtgesetz) provides that permits are to be granted as a matter of principle—rejection is therefore not intended. Nevertheless, filing an application remains mandatory.
Source: Berliner Zeitung
“Niemand hat die Absicht, einen Ausreiseantrag abzulehnen.”
(“Nobody intends to reject a travel permit!” - A reference to East-German leader Walter Ulbricht saying “Nobody intends to build a wall” before they built the Berlin wall)
