• marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I wonder if it’s one of those cases of military refusing to follow illegal orders.

  • apparia@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Everyone is reporting on these ships making it through the strait which is still under Iranian control. Few seem to mention the part in the Gulf of Oman where the US is actually implementing its blockade. The poster child, Rich Starry, mentioned in the article, did this a few hours after clearing the strait, still far from the Arabian Sea:

    Marine tracker timelapse showing RICH STARRY travelling southeast out of the Strait of Hormuz, halting and showing stale data for around 3.5 hours, and then returning back the way it came at speed.

    That sure doesn’t look like a ship breaching a blockade without incident.

    It’s too early to say how this will play out on a larger scale but for these specific ships a lot of reporting is really fucking misleading at the moment.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      So you think a ship that was moving at maybe 5 knots/hr instantly turned around and in less than 30 minutes accelerated past 50 knots/hr?

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        5 hours ago

        The fact that you are measuring speed in knots per hour invalidates your point.

        Please use a correct measurement, and try again.

          • SaltSong@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            25 minutes ago

            I find that reasonably unlikely, unless it is a naval ship. I don’t think cargo ships go that fast unless empty, and highly motivated. Possibly not even then.

            Do we have a reliable source for this data?

            • SaltSong@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I’m being accurate. “Knots” is “nautical miles per hour,” as you correctly described.

              • marcos@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                If we are being really pedantic. Knots is a measure of distance, and the fact that people have been using that wrong for several centuries does not turn a rope tied at one point into a time-changing object.

          • NoblePutty@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I think there point is that knots is not a measurement of distance over time so you can’t technically travel in knots per hour.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Look what Iran can do that Trump can’t! Actually, so far everything is Iran doing things Trump can’t, like win a war or stop a boat.