Also very lengthy all the time. It can’t really summarise without rambling. It’s in no way succinct and too chatty. Verbose, you might say. Garrulous even. Loquacious, if you prefer. Needs to pipe down. Can’t rein it in. Doesn’t shut the fuck up.
That’s the biggest problem in my opinion. They are scary good at generating text. But there’s effectively no filter, it’s just an endless stream of vaguely plausible text, true or false. And unfortunately, humans are prone to think “wow that’s a lot of text, they must’ve done their research and put in tons of effort!” because historically that was for the most part true.
For example: all those guys who say “AI made me 10x more productive” are almost certainly measuring it by lines of code. As we all know, more code is almost inevitably an unmaintainable buggy mess.
Copyright is a fictional protection designed to enrich corporations. It does very little for actual creators. If this is what it takes to destroy copyright, so be it.
I mean, LLMs are quite literally random word generators with weighted input. The one thing they do best is generate random strings of words according to the rule set defined within the model.
They think people use A Lot of words because websites use A Lot of words because if they don’t then google deems the total page content lesser and drops its ranking (the ol “personal blog entry on a recipe” trope)
The machine whaargaarbles to please the humans based on the humans who wharrrgarbled to please the machine.
Also very lengthy all the time. It can’t really summarise without rambling. It’s in no way succinct and too chatty. Verbose, you might say. Garrulous even. Loquacious, if you prefer. Needs to pipe down. Can’t rein it in. Doesn’t shut the fuck up.
Let’s dig into that.
That’s the biggest problem in my opinion. They are scary good at generating text. But there’s effectively no filter, it’s just an endless stream of vaguely plausible text, true or false. And unfortunately, humans are prone to think “wow that’s a lot of text, they must’ve done their research and put in tons of effort!” because historically that was for the most part true.
For example: all those guys who say “AI made me 10x more productive” are almost certainly measuring it by lines of code. As we all know, more code is almost inevitably an unmaintainable buggy mess.
no, the biggest problem is they are stealing someone else’s work and making money with it, depriving the original author reward for their work.
Even bigger than that is the environmental impact the stupid data centers for LLMs do.
I think we disagree on order of importance not what problems are
Copyright is a fictional protection designed to enrich corporations. It does very little for actual creators. If this is what it takes to destroy copyright, so be it.
There are lots of good reasons to hate AI. Copyright infringement isn’t one of them.
As an actual professional creator, yes. Fuck copyright.
Let them fight
I mean, LLMs are quite literally random word generators with weighted input. The one thing they do best is generate random strings of words according to the rule set defined within the model.
…and 10x longer than it needs to be.
It didn’t made me more produvtive but it for sure made me save a LOT of time writing boilerplate code
They think people use A Lot of words because websites use A Lot of words because if they don’t then google deems the total page content lesser and drops its ranking (the ol “personal blog entry on a recipe” trope)
The machine whaargaarbles to please the humans based on the humans who wharrrgarbled to please the machine.