• Free_Appalachia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Could we get a non YouTube link, since YouTube is owned by google and is causing the problem discussed by this video?

  • PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    Isn’t it ironic how ICE agents wear masks, while scanning everyone else’s faces? Also props to Second Thought for not pushing defeatist mind-poison, because that’s exactly what they want: for us to feel powerless, and making it seem “resistance is futile”.

    • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t have to succeed for me. If my actions to lead to the success of another’s resistance that will still satisfy.

      • PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m not entirely sure what you’re trying to say. It to me reads like you would contribute to someone’s resistance, but not for yourself, but for someone else instead? Which in itself is absolutely fine, but I hope you’re not under the impression, such technology only affects persons targeted by ICE. That these systems are used for that is simply insult to injury, that is the overall privacy-implications of mass-surveillance.

        • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 hours ago

          You can chip away at power structures and resist them. You still lose but leave them weakened and more vulnerable to the next to challenge them. Eventually they fall.

          If you comply instead, you strengthen the power structures that do harm anyway.

          The only rational move is to resist.

  • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Rights violations in Iran was one of their many post-excuses for invading, while doing the literal same things domestically.

    Hypocrisy is a requirement in the Republican party. They are not ashamed of it.

      • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        Broadening the blame away from the worst offender only serves to help the worst offenders get away with it.

        Stop it.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          When the constitutional lawyer Barack Obama ran for president, he said that the was against warrentless mass surveillance.

          When Snowden revealed the wide use of the PRSIM and Five Eyes agreements to enable mass surveillance of multiple countries without court order, Obama then had Snowden’s passport revoked while he was looking for political asylum, and said:

          On June 19, 2013, U.S. president Barack Obama, during a visit to Germany, stated that the NSA’s data gathering practices constitute “a circumscribed, narrow system directed at us being able to protect our people”.[21]

          Obama didn’t reel in the NSA when it was made public, as a constitutional lawyer because it was trying to stop terrorists. Like how Bush did. Like how Trump did. Like how Biden did. Like how Trump is now.

          They don’t care about you. They want you to think they do. But if they did, they’d end the panopticon state. Obama didn’t even close GitMo.

        • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Broadening the blame away from the worst offender

          No one is doing that, liberal. Reds and Blues are the same face of the same fucking coin.

              • dubyakay@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                1 day ago

                The phrase is “two sides of the same coin”. Meaning exactly what you are saying. That they are both the capitalist party. As opposed to another proverbial coin, that of the socialists, anarchists, Monarchist, etc.

                • SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  14
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Can’t you guys get neologisms and irony? I KNOW what is the original idiom. HOWEVER, I’m deliberately changing it to mean there isn’t even a simulacrum of difference between Democrats and Republicans. Ah, the eternal marvel of the English language: its breathtaking inability to stray from a pre-written script. No wonder it’s the language of contracts, with every clause so exquisitely, flawlessly delineated. Naturally, people then start behaving as if they’re perpetually executing contracts with one another, forever in hot pursuit of pecuniary advantage. And from that, of course, sprang Common Law, Capitalism, and Imperialism - what a coincidence. It’s just so delightfully easy to build colonies and murder on an industrial scale when the target is nothing more than a number. Precisely because they can’t think beyond greed and individualism, they end up so utterly, pathetically lost the moment they set foot in collectivist countries.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      The US and Israel were trying to push the women’s rights angle with their manufactured protests, then bombed a girls school killing ~150 mostly schoolchildren.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The Hippocritic Oath

        I swear by LinkedIn, “disruption,” and the invisible hand of the market that I will fulfill this oath to the best of my metric-driven ability.

        I will critique my teachers for their lack of personal branding.

        I will inform every patient that their illness is, ultimately, a failure of hustle culture, poor risk management, and not having a diverse investment portfolio.

        I will refuse deadly drugs but will absolutely shame you for buying avocado toast instead of a high-deductible health plan.

        Whatever house I enter, I will come for the sick — and leave a QR code to my Substack explaining how bootstraps could have prevented all of this.

        I will not repeat what I see or hear in private — but I will monetize the general vibe as a case study in “choice architecture.”

        If I keep this oath, may I achieve synergistic growth. If not… well, the market will correct you, not me.

  • unknownuserunknownlocation@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    How about this: it’s awful in both places. Just because another country started doing it as well doesn’t excuse anything, it means they’re now both doing something unacceptable.

    • stumu415@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I lived and worked in both the US and China. My life was infinitely better in China. You don’t even notice the cameras but what you do notice is that I can go to my café, leave my electric scooter unlocked with helmet on, get a table outside, put my laptop on it and then go inside to order coffee without any fear anything will get stolen. In the parks there are public coat racks and people put their jackets, backpacks and other stuff on without any hesitation. You feel safe at night walking down the street by yourself. This feeling I rarely have anywhere else. Delivery packages are left outside and gathered sometimes outside of the compound on the public walkway without being stolen.

      Now whenever I travel to Europe, I have to totally reverse this behavior otherwise all my shit will be gone. That to me is awful.

        • davel@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Crime would plummet if most people were content and had enough money to just breath and enjoy life

          You don’t realize that you just explained why crime is low in China. It’s low because socialism works.

        • stumu415@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I wanted to start a rebuttal but realistically I’ll never change your mind. I just want to say all the things you mentioned like healthcare, housing, education, infrastructure (how is the high speed rail network in the US?) , social security, living wage, and privacy laws like the GDPR are all part of life in China. You make it sound, like most ignorant people who never visit China, like it’s some North Korea here. At least China is not beholden to its tech companies and lobby groups, who buy and own the current US regime. There is more competition and choice here than I ever had in the US. With the exception of ranch sauce that is. Lasty the big difference between China and most Asian countries vs western civilization, is the sense of community. In the US most people are selfish and for themselves - maybe because of the lack of the basic services you mentioned - and if your job doesn’t benefit them, no interest. Especially covid this difference in community became very clear.

    • iByteABit@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was specifically calling out the hypocrisy of the USA’s excuses to do imperialism. With that said though, it is now clear as day that while China has the ability to do what the USA is doing technologically, they are using that surveillance more sparingly and for better reasons than the USA. It’s not in China that masked thugs are scanning you with their phones hoping to lock you up in some undocumented place and then either keep you there or send you to a random country away from your family.

      I’m not a fan of mass surveillance in any case, but it’s just so hilariously ironic that the same people who fearmongered 24/7 in their media about China being this panopticon dystopia, are the same ones now exceeding this in every way imaginable, far surpassing the imagination of fiction like 1984 or Black Mirror.

      • thomasshikari@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        Kind of like how a lot of the same people who were screaming and going crazy about the Patriot Act 20 years ago are the same ones who want to defend Flock cameras.

      • BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s hilarious if you believe this, the USA is a surveillance state, sure, but China is clearly not any better. They have cameras everywhere and extremely advanced surveillance tech.

        • Lenin's Dumbbell @lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 day ago

          And yet China is a much safer country than the US.

          The longer you refuse to accept reality, the worse your situation will keep getting

      • N.E.P.T.R@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        China was doing that kinda thing in Hong Kong not that long ago. Killing protestors, disappearing people, attacking journalists and doctors. They just aren’t right now. They are srill that bad.