• eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I would love to drive an EV, but the price premium for it buys a lot of gas. I also detest cloud-depending computers on wheels, and the charging infrastructure is a bit thin.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You didn’t have to be a fiery-eyed climate activist for a long time, just somebody with basic financial literacy, that is able to look at the total cost of ownership of a vehicle.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Are you sure? Because until fairly recently, the price difference would take the average owner about 10 years worth of charging at home to make up for and at the same time, EVs have depreciated faster than contemporary ICE vehicles.

        If you got an Audi E-Tron or Porsche Taycan when they came out, you got OBLITERATED on depreciation. If you’re buying them used now, deal of a lifetime (though VAG interiors have sucked for like a decade so you’re still paying a lot of money for touchscreen hell). As long as you have someone that can repair õ the batteries and motors if needed, they were a bit, uh, problematic for the early years. And replacement costs are high. But repairs can be affordable.

        • Rooster326@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re trying to give a reference for the average person and then you mention Porsche Taycan, and repairing electrical systems capable of killing a human being…

        • Prathas@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          If you got an Audi E-Tron or Porsche Taycan when they came out, you got OBLITERATED on depreciation.

          Um, shouldn’t you be talking about Priuses and cars accessible to normal people? Way to scapegoat!

      • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unless your job involves driving >100km DAILY, current EVs are perfectly fine at achieving that with just in home charging without any fancy installations.

        • Montagge@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I drive about 145km every day I go into work. The EVs I see $5000 or less can barely get me to work if even that.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is what people often ignore, usually only new vehicles are compared. You can get 1600 km on a tank of diesel in a 2000 euro car and refuelling is quick anyway. Cheap used EVs have not gotten there yet.

            A lot of people can start driving EVs when a used EV is cheap AND gets you proper range. I don’t mean comparable to diesel, but like 400 km of range in a vehicle at 5k EUR and I reckon nearly everyone driving used cars will start looking at used EVs.

          • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            If you can charge at work you might only have to go a little above that price range to just comfortably get to work. If not tho that’s rough

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree it’s not a rational choice but, as a human, I do not always make rational decisions.

      I’ll be able to get so many cool cars that make fart noises!

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    The top comment of the OP article is very interesting, too.

    This is a kind of economic tipping point. A sea change which will have global consequences. Among other things, it makes it much less interesting to invest in any new fossil infrastructure - if demand for gas shrinks that rapidly, investments are much less likely to turn into profits.

    • reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      That is an interesting point, I’m in the category that only has an old gas car but it pretty much only gets used for occasional hiking trips and similar, not commuting or regular errands.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes. One reason is because the economic advantage of electric vehicles is largest for people who drive a lot. Thus the vehicles which are driven most, are being replaced fastest, just as said comment explains.

  • Switorik@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    In the US, I’m worried our power grid wouldn’t handle the load if everyone swapped to EVs. We’re already struggling with all the data centers moving in.

      • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Battery technology is improving so rapidly that it will become economical soon to charge a stationary battery from home solar during the day, and charge the car from that battery at night (which also means much more expensive fast-charging technology is just not needed to get to work and back). For many people doing some amount of home office or driving modest distances, charging from home solar is already the cheapest option.

        And here in Europe, employers are offering charging at work.

    • cenzorrll@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      EV charging really isn’t as demanding as you’d think. Most people would be able to charge a couple days of use overnight using the same amount of power as running a space heater.

      Sooo maybe you’re right of you live in Texas.

      • Switorik@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        As an electrician who designs charging stations, I beg to differ. The small 120v trickle chargers work the way you imagine. There’s a much larger energy demand needed when you’re running 60-120 amps per pedestal times 10 to 20 per station times how many stations we would need for every day commuters.

        Edit: Here’s a link to a fleet EV charging station . https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/products/emobility/green-motion-dc-ev-chargers/eaton-green-motion-dc-fast-charger-datasheet-td154002en.pdf

        These are the chargers we install in mass for every day general public use. Your going to want to look for input amps to see how much power they require. Your trickle charger is in the single digits compared to these.

        • noodles@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          The point is that most commuters don’t need the larger chargers, they can get all their commiting energy from a 120v wall charger and save fast chargers for road trips. I’ve been driving a PHEV or EV for 6 years, 120 mile commute ~3 days a week, and have used fast chargers maybe 10 times total.

            • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’ve had an ev for 8 years. I slow charge overnight for 95% of my milage. Same for everyone I know that lives in a house or townhouse. Apartment living varies depending on how old the apartment is and they may need to use other paid charging. Putting more all day or all night slower charging would help with load. Most people only have to use high speed charging when they don’t have accessible charging either at home or at work.

            • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orgOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              it’s typical car industry misinformation to highlight extreme use cases as if they were a reasonable average case. That’s why Americans pony up to buy and pay for a massive truck while a french citizen in the same situation would be satisfied with a Fiat 500 or a Citroën CV2.

      • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        In Texas if there were a shitload of cars plugged into backfeed capable chargers it would probably save their shitty grid, not hurt it.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most EV charging is done over night during the most “off-peak” hours you can find. It won’t really be a problem.

    • 18107@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Oil refineries use so much energy that they quite often have a dedicated power plant. The energy required to refine enough fuel to drive 100km could instead be used to drive an EV more than 50km.

      Switching to EVs will have much less of an impact on the grid than it initially appears. With overnight or midday charging, EVs can even help spread the load throughout the day and help reduce the evening peak.

      V2G/V2H can reduce this peak even further, while only using a tiny amount from each car battery.

      Air-conditioning is also a big concern for the energy grid, but as with all new technologies, the grid will be upgraded to handle it. Unless you are employed by a grid operator to plan for the future, you don’t need to worry about it.

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        At the scale of minutes and seconds, this isn’t wrong. It just misses a few nuances like frequency maintenance issues due to lack of inertia in a majority solar grid

        • 18107@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          My local grid frequently hits 100% renewable power, and has even exceeded 100% of demand from only rooftop solar with commercial solar and wind also producing at that time.

          The grid needed a few modifications, and there was some brief instability, but everyone survived it and the grid has been stable for over a year.

          I think we’ll be fine.

      • Switorik@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m a electrical designer and this is a discussion we have nearly weekly. Charging EVs on a commercial scale is very different on a residential scale. Our energy grid is in shambles.