cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/8995279
cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/63702
Last month’s midterms were an earthquake for the Democratic establishment. Across the country, progressive challengers sailed to victory calling for abolishing ICE, reducing inequality, and addressing the crisis of affordability.
But one message rang particularly clear: After years of pro-Palestine mobilizations, U.S. voters are rejecting Zionist politicians.
Nowhere has this been clearer than in New York City, a Zionist stronghold and the epicenter of mobilizations for Gaza. Brad Lander, Claire Valdez, and Darializa Avila Chevalier were outspoken about their support for Palestine, openly calling Israel’s assault a genocide. They defeated establishment Democratic opponents who in some cases received hundreds of thousands of dollars from pro-Israeli PACs. Mayor Zohran Mamdani, too, came to power in part due to his stance on Israel.
Pro-Palestine candidates are also racking up wins elsewhere. Melat Kiros (Colorado) and Chris Rabb (Pennsylvania) are poised to win House seats in November, while Michigan’s Abdul El-Sayed may win the Democratic nomination for Senate.
In other words, unconditional support for Israel is becoming toxic for Democratic Party politicians. Radicalized by almost three years of livestreamed genocide in Gaza and increasing ethnic cleansing in the West Bank, for many young people in particular, Palestine has become a central issue.
But the movement for Palestine can’t let up — especially since the Democrats see which way the wind is blowing.
Don’t Let the Democrats Fool You
The movement against the genocide has forced the Democratic Party to reckon with how their support for Israel is losing voters. In April, 40 Democratic senators supported a Bernie Sanders-backed resolution to cut weapons sales to the Zionist state. (The resolution failed.) More and more politicians are rejecting money from AIPAC, and some are going so far as to describe Israel’s actions as a genocide. A few days ago in Tel Aviv, Rahm Emanuel, the former Chicago mayor and Obama administration chief of staff, said “unconditional support” for Israel must end.
So, are Democrats becoming anti-Zionist? Not so fast!
While some may be softening their rhetoric and eschewing the most objectionable elements of the pro-Israel lobby (e.g., AIPAC), these actions don’t reflect a change of heart or meaningful policy change. Rather, they’re attempts to de-fang the movement for Palestine and channel disgruntled voters back into the Democratic Party.
Emanuel, who is exploring a 2028 presidential run, is a case in point. Like many other Democrats, he pins the blame squarely on Benjamin Netanyahu, rather than on the Zionist project. If Israel is engaging in something resembling mass slaughter and ethnic cleansing, the reasoning goes, it’s only because of the Israeli prime minister’s reckless “military-only approach,” and his “unwilling[ness] to plan for a day after in Gaza.” And Emanuel’s concern comes from a place of wanting stability and support for Israel, not from any support for Palestinian self-determination.
For evidence that Emanuel is not proposing a break with Israel, look no further than who applauded his speech: lifelong Zionist Hillary Clinton, and Democratic Majority For Israel, who said his words were “grounded in a sincere commitment to Israel’s future security and prosperity.”
In other words, to the extent that Democrats have harsh words for Israeli politicians, advocate sanctions on West Bank settlers, and call for an end to unconditional aid to Israel — with that last proposal supported by Netanyahu himself — it’s only in service of recouping the country’s lost support among Americans and the international community.
Reject the Whole Democratic Party
But why are establishment Democrats so invested in maintaining support for Israel, if their base is overwhelmingly voting them out of office and turning against Zionism?
The U.S. regime’s Zionism isn’t about any one individual’s beliefs, or even about AIPAC funding. Rather, the United States supports Israel because it acts as U.S. imperialism’s guard dog in the Middle East. The Zionist state, armed to the teeth, helps wage Washington’s wars in the region, including most recently the war against Iran. This is why U.S. policy toward Israel does not fundamentally change, whether under Obama, Trump, or Biden. And it’s why the Democrats will never fully abandon Zionism, even if they sand down its roughest edges.
This is just one reason why leftists cannot support the Democrats, and why we call for organizations like DSA to break with the Democratic Party. Lander, Valdez, and Chevalier’s open embrace of the Palestine movement is progressive, and their victories are an auspicious sign of the changing tides in U.S. society. But running as Democrats helps channel this progressive energy into — and rehabilitate — an imperialist, Zionist Party. And once in Congress, they will face enormous pressure to toe the Democratic Party line on Israel.
We have the power to keep the movement for Palestine moving, and to fight for liberation for all Palestinians. After all, it’s our protests, encampments, and mobilizations that have forced a reckoning among Democrats and even caused the labor movement, including the UAW, to take up the Palestinian cause. And we can go much further. Let’s keep it up — in the streets and in our workplaces!
The post Israel Is Becoming Toxic for Democrats. Let’s Keep It Up! appeared first on Left Voice.
From Left Voice via This RSS Feed.
The title needs to be more like “The DNC is finally waking up to the the massive cost of their accepting Israel’s bribes” It was always toxic. The loss of the 2024 election proves that. They will lose 2026 and 2028 too if they dont acknowledge the obvious. Democratic party voters generally dont like funding murder and fascism. You’d think their “professional” highly-paid “strategists” would be able to understand that.
The hard truth is that winning without support of AIPAC has been really hard in the past. Certainly a part of the reason Bernie never became president for example. This only started to turn with Gaza.
It also shows that not taking AIPAC money, has to be rewarded by voters.
The hard truth is that winning without support of AIPAC has been really hard in the past. Certainly a part of the reason Bernie never became president for example. This only started to turn with Gaza.
Well maybe the the Democrats who felt they couldn’t win without AIPAC support should move to Israel and try their luck over there. They say they hate Netenyahu, well they can run against him! (Looking at you Schumer!) I’m sure AIPAC would love that.
Israel has a LOT of money going into the pockets of a LOT of politicians. I’m fairly convinced coercion and threats are also part of that equation. See: Epstein Island
Didn’t they JUST strike down an attempt at stopping funding for Israel?
Also this is a bullshit both sides hit piece aimed at garner more votes for the right or whatever new hydra head that will pop up post Trump.
APIAC support should be a litmus test and every single DNC incumbent and primary candidate that fails it should be replaced. publicly shamed, and socially ostracized.
There should really be a litany of litmus tests but I guess we’ll have to settle for not spending our tax dollars on turning Palestinian kids into skeletons.
You’ll get your wish soon. Aipac support will soon be a thing of the past, now that isreal can get funds straight from their new partnership with three letter agencies. Tax dollars that go to the Pentagon will be sent without any necessary disclosure to whatever they want
💯
Nice, so you want the Epstein class to keep the larcenied money.
Removed by mod
What point are you even trying to make? You’d prefer the norm to be taking the rape/genocide money?
I’m black anarchist, my norm is to empower you and me, and get actually compensated for our labor: none of which Demagogues desire.
Black anarchist, is that the new flavor of the month?
It’s pretty old. In fact, it’s still alive.
Nice, so you want the Epstein class to keep the larcenied money.
Care to explain how not voting for people who support Israel means I want rich people to keep their money? You lost me.
Not directly redistributing the money you allowed yourselves to be stolen to in the first place.
Why are you even demanding your larcenists power over your interests‽
Who goes to a thief and says: “pretty please stop a genocide in some foreign country you’re profiting from!🙏”I am extremely extremely lost what is your actual political plan here. Like are you so traumatized you believe voting will end a genocide from the people that created genocide in the first place‽
This is perfect being the enemy of good. What is your alternative plan and how are you taking steps to organize for it?
This is perfect being the enemy of good
Remind me how this idiom helps in your current “crisis”?
What is your alternative plan
I am black anarchist
how are you taking steps to organize for it?
empower you and me, and get actually compensated for our labor
Take some tea or coffee, sit down, read, and let’s actually revolt.
Glad you reminded me, I hadn’t checked my new rep for AIPAC contributions. Looking pretty good! It’d be nice to have someone in TN not bought by AIPAC.

Tennessee is fucking hopeless for at least an entire generation. Full Republican control and gerrymandered to fuck. TN has a few awesome reps, but they are in the minority and hold essentially zero power outside of generating a few headlines. But the TN legislative loves to silence the black representation. For such a beautiful state, it’s local government is all power, greed, and corruption.
That kinda talk has been going on in TN since I was a kid. They said the same thing about Georgia not too long ago. I’m of the mind that breaking one-party control generally looks hopeless right up until it starts to buckle, and then change can appear to happen quickly. Sorta like gradual wear on a machine manifesting in a sudden dramatic failure. I don’t know if or when we’ll pull that off in TN but I don’t think it’s hopeless.
That guy is going good places, I’ve heard about him
True, let’s purity test the one party fighting against US-Fascism on this one niche issue nobody actually cares about.
Can’t see that going wrong.
It’s cute that you think the democratic party is fighting against anything but progressive candidates.
Good thing it’s primary time! Kick their asses to the curb
It’s a popular issue that plenty of people care about, and any good person should care about. And yes, that’s what a primary is for? What do you think the point of them is exactly?
Being against a Purity tests, and the “purity” test is if the politician is cool with genocide
Both parties are infected by dark money and bad faith but the left seems to want to do something about it. That means culling the sick and weak from the herd and letting newer, stronger candidates emerge from the pack that are ready to not just defend us but provide opportunities for us to grow.
Not a single liberal Democrat does. They exist to concede.
Yes, let’s just give the assholes aligned with the most evil shit happening on this planet a pass because the other guys are also shitheads at home.
How DARE people Want their Tax Dollars and MILITARY INTELLIGENCE to be Used ONLY in the US!
-You!
the one party
There you are, I missed you!
So in a scale from 0-1, what is James Carville testing?Tanki RageBait. Block. Ignore. Move on.
What do you mean by this? Do you mean Mare is a “tankie”? If that’s the case I don’t think you know what people mean when they say that (pejorative for leftist that does stuff), if you mean ragebait intended for “tankies” then sure I guess?









